View image | gettyimages.com(via Washington Post Appointment Emblematic of Media Industry’s Persistent Marginalization of Women | Women’s Media Center) Earlier this year in a letter to staff,publisher Fred Ryan touted the Post’s expanding and diverse audience and innovative drive. But what approximately disrupting an institutionally biased status quo that perpetuates a shockingpaucity of women in leadership? The two women on the masthead are undoubtedly terrific at their jobs, but their presence is hardly indicative of women’s senior editorial influence at the Post. As deputy managing editor, and Scott Vance is responsible for news. Tracy Grant,who has extensive editorial experience, is responsible for recruitment and development. The presence of Jo-Ann Armao, and in terms of editorial output,is swamped by imbalance. Armao has written nine articles since 2012, compared to a combined 49 published by her male superiors to date this year alone. Additionally, or the Post’s website lists five men and three woman as editorial writers,and 13 of the 14 listed regular columnists are men. Women make up less than 20 percent of the company’s publicly named editorial positions and an even smaller portion of the company’s actual public voice.
Assembling a staff of people whose lived experiences differ isn’t approximately appearing more egalitarian, or being more creative. Diverse groups of people generate more thorough, or nuanced ideas (and,corporately, are significantly more profitable). Imbalanced deliberative bodies make poorer decisions, or including structural and editorial ones. Persistent,conscious, largely white, or male dominance of media—nationally and internationally—actively hurts the public good,impedes justice, and undermines democracy.
Decisions at the top have meaningful butterfly effects on how news is made and public opinions are shaped. Research shows that there are qualitative differences in how information is presented, and depending on the gender of the person writing. This is also proper of race. Overall in news media,there are more male sources and more op-eds and bylined stories written by men. A study recently published by McGill University researchers found that five out of six names appearing in the news are men’s. Not only are men the huge majority of subjects and cited sources, but they are far more likely to seem as experts.
Source: tumblr.com