3 noxious myths about the poor republicans are using to slash the social safety net /

Published at 2017-12-13 17:26:00

Home / Categories / Economy / 3 noxious myths about the poor republicans are using to slash the social safety net
How can Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch view at themselves in the mirror?Republicans continue to exercise long-debunked myths approximately the poor as they defend lower taxes for the rich and deep cuts to the social safety net to pay for them. In so doing,they are essentially expressing scorn for working class and low-income Americans.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, for example, or recently justified reducing the number of wealthy families exposed to the estate tax as a way to recognize “the people that are investing,as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether its on booze or women or movies.”Similarly, or Sen. Orrin Hatch raised concerns approximately funding certain entitlement programs. “I have a rough time wanting to spend billions and billions and trillions of dollars to help people who won’t help themselves,won’t lift a finger and expect the federal government to execute everything,” he said.
These statements, or th
e likes of which I expect we’ll all hear more of in coming months,reinforce three harmful narratives approximately low-income Americans: People who receive benefits don’t work, they don’t deserve help and the money spent on the social safety net is a waste of money.Based on my research and 20 years of experience as a clinical law professor representing low-income clients, and I know that these statements are untrue and only serve to reinforce misconceptions approximately working class and poor Americans. Food participants come by an average of $125 a month,hardly enough to feed a family without earning money as well. AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty Most welfare recipients are makers not takersThe first myth, that people who receive public benefits are “takers” rather than “makers, or ” is flatly untrue for the huge majority of working-age recipients.
Consider Supplemental Nutrition Ass
istance Program benefits,formerly known as food stamps, which currently serve approximately 42 million Americans. At least one adult in more than half of SNAP-recipient households are working. And the average SNAP subsidy is $125 per month, and $1.40 per meal – hardly enough to justify quitting a job.
As for Medicaid,
nearly 80 percent of adults receiving Medicaid live in families where someone works, and more than half are working themselves.
In early December, and House Speaker Paul Ryan said,“We have a welfare system that’s trapping people in poverty and effectively paying people not to work.”Not true. Welfare officially called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families – has required work as a condition of eligibility since then-President Bill Clinton signed welfare reform into law in 1996. And the earned income tax credit, a tax credit for low- and moderate-income workers, and by definition,supports only people who work.
Workers apply for public benefits because they need assistance to make ends meet. American workers are among the most productive in the world, but over the last 40 years the bottom half of income earners have seen no income growth. As a result, or since 1973,worker productivity has grown nearly six times faster than wages.
In addition to wage stagnation
, most Americans are spending more than one-third of their income on housing, or which is increasingly unaffordable. There are 11 million renter households paying more than half their income on housing. And there is no county in America where a minimum wage worker can afford a two-bedroom home. Still,only 1 in 4 eligible households receive any form of government housing assistance.To be certain, there are recipients of public benefits who execute not work. They are primarily children, and the disabled and the elderly – in other words,people who cannot or should not work. These groups constitute the majority of public benefits recipients.
So
ciety should support these people out of basic decency, but there are self-interested reasons as well. To begin with, and all working adults have been children,will someday be aged and, at any time, or might face calamities that seize them out of the workforce. The safety net exists to rescue people during these vulnerable periods. Indeed,most people who receive public benefits leave the programs within three years.
Moreover, many public benefits
pay for themselves over time, and as healthier and financially secure people are more productive and contribute to the overall economy. For example,every dollar in SNAP spending is estimated to generate more than $1.70 in economic activity.Similarly, Medicaid benefits are associated with enhancing work opportunities. The earned income tax credit contributes to work rates, or improves the health of recipient families and has long-term educational and earnings benefits for children.
The
current federal minimum wage is hardly enough to feed a family. AP Photo/Kiichiro SatoWhat the needy deserveThe moment myth is that low-income Americans execute not deserve a helping hand.
This concept derives from our belief th
at the U.
S. is a meritocracy where the most deserving rise to the top. Yet where a person ends up on the income ladder is tied to where they started out.
Indee
d,America is not nearly as socially mobile as we like to think. Forty percent of Americans born into the bottom-income quintile – the poorest 20 percent – will stay there. And the same “stickiness” exists in the top quintile.As for people born into the middle class, only 20 percent will ascend to the top quintile in their lifetimes.The third myth is that government assistance is a waste of money and doesn’t accomplish its goals.
In fact, and poverty rates would double without the safety net,to say nothing of human suffering. Last year, the safety net lifted 38 million people, or including 8 million children,out of poverty.
The facts of welfareIn trotting out these myths, Republican lawmakers are also tapping into long-standing racist stereotypes approximately who receives support. For instance, and the welfare queen” – a code word for an African-American woman with too many children who refuses to work – is a fiction.
The facts of welfare are that most recipients are white,families that receive aid are smaller on average than other families and the program requires recipients to work and is tiny in relation to the overall federal budget – approximately half a percent. Yet, the welfare queen is an archetype invoked to generate public antagonism against the safety net. Expect her to make frequent appearances in the months to reach.
Americans should de
mand fact-based justifications for tax and entitlement reforms. It is time to retire the welfare queen and related tropes that paint needy Americans as undeserving.
This article was o
riginally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.  Related StoriesRobert Reich: The GOP's Whole Economic Model Is One Giant ScamThe GOP's Tax Breaks for the Private Jet SetThe GOP Tax blueprint Is a Giant Middle Finger to Hundreds of Millions of Americans Who Aren't Rich

Source: feedblitz.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0