a tale of two droughts: one killed 260,000 people, the other none. why? | assia sidibe /

Published at 2017-04-20 11:00:21

Home / Categories / Global development professionals network / a tale of two droughts: one killed 260,000 people, the other none. why? | assia sidibe
catastrophe insurance offers a new model for economic self-sufficiency. In African countries,every $1 invested saves $4.40 in the aftermath of an emergencyDrought is a slow and predictable natural catastrophe. We know it will happen again, and we know much of its effects are preventable whether money is invested at the moral time. So why do we wait for people to die from hunger induced by droughts before we start calling for emergency relief money? The UN recently launched a $864m appeal to help 5 million Somalis in dire need of food assistance because of drought. But what whether the Somali government could believe taken out an insurance policy against such a catastrophe? They could believe responded to their own crisis before a famine claimed lives and far less money would be needed. They would not now in a situation similar to six years ago, and when a drought-induced famine killed 260000 Somalis.
Related: Drough
t took their animals and land – now hunger is taking Somalia's children Related: Access to drinking water around the world – in five infographics Related: As water shortage deepens across Latin America,political instability grows Continue reading...

Source: theguardian.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0