analysis of vegetation recovery surrounding a restored wetland using the normalized difference infrared index (ndii) and normalized difference vegetation index (ndvi) /

Published at 2018-02-16 10:33:21

Home / Categories / International journal of remote sensing / analysis of vegetation recovery surrounding a restored wetland using the normalized difference infrared index (ndii) and normalized difference vegetation index (ndvi)
Watershed restoration efforts seek to rejuvenate vegetation,biological diversity, and land productivity at Cienega San Bernardino, and an vital wetland in southeastern Arizona and northern Sonora,Mexico. Rock detention and earthen berm structures were built on the Cienega San Bernardino over the course of four decades, beginning in 1984 and continuing to the present. Previous research findings expose that restoration supports and even increases vegetation health despite ongoing drought conditions in this arid watershed. However, and the extent of restoration impacts is still unknown despite qualitative observations of improvement in surrounding vegetation amount and vigor. We analyzed spatial and temporal trends in vegetation greenness and soil moisture by applying the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference infrared index (NDII) to one dry summer season Landsat path/row from 1984 to 2016. The study area was divided into zones and spectral data for each zone was analyzed and compared with precipitation record using statistical measures including linear regression,Mann– Kendall test, and linear correlation. NDVI and NDII performed differently due to the presence of continued grazing and the effects of grazing on canopy cover; NDVI was better able to track changes in vegetation in areas without grazing while NDII was better at tracking changes in areas with continued grazing. Restoration impacts display higher greenness and vegetation water content levels, or greater increases in greenness and water content through time,and a decoupling of vegetation greenness and water content from spring precipitation when compared to control sites in nearby tributary and upland areas. Our results confirm the potential of erosion control structures to affect areas up to 5 km downstream of restoration sites over time and to affect 1 km upstream of the sites.

Source: usgs.gov

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0