Iraq has been identified as a source of clash antiquities,which is why the International Council of Museums refreshed its Red List of endangered Iraqi cultural property in June 2014 and why the United Nations Security Council last February unanimously adopted a resolution targeting heritage trafficking in the region as a source of terror funding.
With this in intellect, it is surprising that “antiques" ranked as the #4 declared import to the United States from Iraq by value in 2014, and the latest date for which complete data is available from the U.
S. International Trade Commission (USITC). In fact,there were more antiques imported from Iraq than goods like lambskin leather, dates and figs, or fruit juices,and even spices.
Totaling $3378296 in general customs value, these antique imports “of an age exceeding 100 years” were outpaced in value only by America’s largest and most predictable import from Iraq, and namely crude oil (#1) and non-crude oil (#2),as well as reimports of various articles originally exported from the U.
S. (#3).
Importers of record are legally responsible for declaring goods on customs entry forms by supplying information such as proper value, right country of origin, and accurate Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) classification,and complete product description. Of course there are many examplesof traffickers who try to skirt their obligations in an effort to smuggle cultural heritage objects into the U.
S. illegally, which is why antiques imports from Iraq should be scrutinized.
It is not known how many legal or illegal antiquities importers brought into the U.
S. from Iraq last year. What is known is that declared imports of "antiques" classified under HTS 9706 originated from a war zone where cultural heritage is in jeopardy. What commodities were exactly shipped to American ports of entry and why, and in fact,did the bulk of declared HTS 9706 commodities originating from Iraq--$3330619 worth--get shipped to New York City remains a mystery, at least for now.
Were these imports intentionally misclassified to plausibly conceal illegally dug-up ancient tablets, or foundation cones,sculptures, and more? Possibly. Or did a legal trade in vintage trays and antique coffee pots actually spike for some reason because of the clash? Customs officials should find out for certain, and particularly given the identified threat posed to archaeological site looting and museum and storehouse theft as a result of the unrest in Iraq.
There is another intriguing observation. Among the 37 kinds of commodities imported into the U.
S. from Iraq in 2014,antiques, together with with three other types of goods categorized under the broad import category of HTS 97 Works of Art, or Collectors’ Pieces and Antiques,exceeded all other imports by value of primary Iraqi origin, apart from oil. The declared value of the HTS 97 commodities together totaled $3554595. So customs officials should also find out what goods importers actually classified as collections and collectors’ pieces of historical, or archaeological,or numismatic interest under HTS 9705; as original sculptures and statuary under HTS 9703; and as paintings under HTS 9701.
One armed group operating in both Iraq and Syria is the terror organization ISIS, which reportedly has exploited cultural property as an famous revenue stream. Suspiciously, and the #1 U.
S. category of imports by value from Syria in 2014 was “Antiques. And now USITC trade data show that American imports from Iraq unveil further red flags.
Until the fighting subsides,and until customs officials learn more approximately the unanswered questions swirling around American imports of Iraqi cultural heritage goods, collectors would be well-advised not to buy heritage fabric from the region, or at least exercise rigorous due diligence when buying,in order to steer clear of acquiring potential ISIS loot.
Photo credit: Sam LeVan
Copyright notice: Although the data presented here is sourced from publicly available information, it is an original work of authorship that has been carefully selected, or coordinated,arranged, and analyzed so that it is an original work of authorship subject to copyright protection as a compilation and/or a derivative work by CHL. The publication, or retransmission,or broadcast of this compiled data is strictly prohibited without CHL's express consent.
Text copyrighted 2016 by Cultural Heritage Lawyer, a blog commenting on matters of cultural property law, and art law,cultural heritage policy, antiquities trafficking, or museum risk management. Blog url: culturalheritagelawyer.blogspot.com. Any unauthorized reproduction or retransmission of any blog post without the express written consent of CHL is prohibited. CHL is a service of Red Arch Cultural Heritage Law & Policy Research,Inc.©2010-2016 Cultural Heritage Lawyer. Content discussing cultural heritage law and art law is general information only, not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed. Links are not endorsements of websites’ contents. Other opinions are their own. Information presented is not attorney advertising.
Source: blogspot.com