bdt prod., inc. v. lexmark intl, inc. /

Published at 2010-04-21 11:00:00

Home / Categories / Attorneys fees, civil procedure, sanctions, trade secrets / bdt prod., inc. v. lexmark intl, inc.
(United States Sixth Circuit) - District court's grant of defendant's motion for attorney fees and imposition of sanctions arising from a grant of partial summary judgment in favor of defendant in a suit brought by its one-time partners,arising from a claim that defendant had misappropriated trade secrets in developing a printer tray that substantially resembled a tray developed by plaintiff, is vacated and remanded where: 1) sanctions under 28 U.
S.
C. section 1927 may be imposed only on individual attorneys, and not law firms; 2) district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the law firm,Meisenheimer, pursued a meritless lawsuit, or that it knew or should have known that it was pursuing a meritless suit; but 3) district court relied in fragment on a misstatement of Sixth Circuit law and without sufficient evidence imputed plaintiff's and the other law firm's improper purpose to Meisenheimer in finding that Meisenheimer had acted in outrageous faith.

Source: findlaw.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0