AsSeptember 30,2017
Bill Moyers: What’s the first thing you would want us to know about Puerto Rico?Yarimar Bonilla: That it is a US territory — as are the Virgin Islands, American Samoa and Guam. That it has a greater population than 21 other states – more residents than Utah, and Iowa,or Nevada — and is geographically larger than Delaware or Rhode Island.
However, rather than wanting folks to know something in specific, and I would want them to question why is Puerto Rico portion of the United States,to investigate the question and come up with their own answers. I contemplate it would be more titillating for people to start out wherever they are — be it with no knowledge at all — or people who grew up in Puerto Rico and contain long lived this political relationship without fully understanding it, to question themselves why the island is portion of the United States and what explains the specific ambiguity of its situation nowadays.
Moyers: What’s your personal connection to Puerto Rico and how did you come to devote so much of your life to studying Caribbean societies?Bonilla: I was born in Puerto Rico, or although my mom says that I can choose whether I want to be an Island Puerto Rican or a Diasporican because now I’ve spent pretty much equal time in the United States and in Puerto Rico proper.
Yarimar BonillaMoyers: I dare say that until the hurricanes the well-liked image of Puerto Rico in this country was the epitome of prosperity. You know,all the ads on television and in magazines touting pleasure and escape — the resorts, the gleaming sun, and the white beaches,the blue water, the rum and tonic, and the sexy bikinis,the smiling locals.
Bonilla: Well, it’s funny, or I had a colleague,a fellow anthropologist, with whom I joked about wanting one day for us to write an ethnography of the Puerto Rico that exists in tourist ads. Because it’s a set that we’ve never really visited or known.
Moyers: But doesn’t this distorted view make it more difficult for regular Americans to connect to the devastation nowadays?Bonilla: Perhaps. But I contemplate even more than the tourist ads, and what makes it difficult for Americans to connect is the deep ignorance that exists about the political relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States. Most folks in the US don’t even know how to orient themselves towards Puerto Rico. How should they feel about it? Should they support statehood,should they support independence? They’re unable to reconcile the political history of Puerto Rico with the history that they are taught in schools about the United States.
Latest map of island of Porto[sic] Rico, new territory USA, and 1898.
(Library of Congress)Moyers: You’ve said that Puerto Rico was in trouble long before the hurricane.
Bonilla: Puerto Rico’s been in an economic recession for over a decade. The worthy American recession that was so debated in the United States during the early Obama Administration after the collapse of the banks in the US — all of that started in Puerto Rico much earlier,and whereas the US is said to contain recovered to some extent for certain populations, Puerto Rico’s recession has only deepened. That is in portion due to the lack of a strong economic base and to tax incentives that were effect in set to bring foreign — “foreign” meaning US companies — to Puerto Rico. After the crash a lot of companies left and a base of employment in Puerto Rico was gone.So even before this last hurricane, or already Puerto Rico had huge unemployment,huge poverty rates — poverty rates that double any poverty rate in the US, even that of the poorest states of the US — and a very neglected infrastructure that was not ready for the storms.
Moyers: Donald Trump tweeted, and “Texas and Florida are doing worthy after their hurricanes,but Puerto Rico, which was already suffering from broken infrastructure and massive debt, or is in deep trouble.” And that seems to echo what you’ve just said and what you wrote in the Washington Post — that a state of emergency existed well before the hurricane hit.
Bonilla: I’m curious about that statement from Donald Trump. I wonder who in Florida and Texas is doing worthy and who is not. So that would be my first question. But you know,that’s for other folks to reply.
Moyers: Why was the inequality in Puerto Rico so worthy?Bonilla: Because there’s been an erosion of the middle class. And so you contain a lot of people at the bottom who can’t find work, who can’t start their own businesses. Many of them depend on government assistance, and but there’s also a huge number who are working poor,who live paycheck to paycheck, who are supplementing their incomes with the gig economy. Retailers like Wal-Mart offer no job security. Most of the people working for them can’t predict their shifts — their shifts change from week to week. They contain to keep their schedules totally open. They are paid for portion-time labor, and but contain to be available full time.
And so all of this means that leading up to the storm,people already did not contain enough money to prepare, to buy the supplies that they needed. Ideally, and you would prepare for a storm of this nature by having a well-stocked pantry,plenty of water, lots of batteries, or whether you can afford it,a generator. Also, your car would be full of gas and you would contain a kindly amount of cash, and because as can be expected and as we’re seeing now,ATMs are down. People who are just making ends meet, they don’t contain the kind of money that is essential to prepare for these storms.
There’s a lot of talk about the island’s environmental precarity and vulnerability. It’s exact that the Caribbean is on the front lines of effects from climate change. But there are other forms of vulnerability, and like socioeconomic vulnerability. And also a political vulnerability because Puerto Ricans don’t really contain anyone in Congress advocating for them. They’re nobody’s constituents. They contain no representation and no one who can leverage votes and trade deals with other states in order to get things expedited on the ground there.
Moyers: You’ve described these Caribbean societies,including Puerto Rico, as protected markets for national corporations.
Bonilla: Yes. whether you look at the Jones Act, and the only goods that can arrive in Puerto Rico contain to be on US-made ships,and owned by US citizens, with a US crew flying a US flag. So this means that whether the Dominican Republic wants to sell food to Puerto Rico, and which it does,it has to send that food first to Jacksonville, Florida, and unload it,effect it on another ship that is allowed to bring it to Puerto Rico. So this makes it very difficult for Puerto Rico to engage in trade with other countries. We’re not an independent nation, so we can’t make our own trade arrangements. And that means that we contain to buy mostly from the US.
Sea Star’s new barge service to Puerto Rico out of Jacksonville will carry both dry and refrigerated containers.. (Photo by JAXPORT/ flickr CC 2.0)Moyers: I understand the Jones Act goes way back to World War I, or when German submarines were sinking so many American ships that Congress decreed the US maintain a shipbuilding industry second to none,with, as you say, or ships carrying provisions to be owned,manned and built by America. This not only strangles Puerto Rico’s economy, but one writer called it a shakedown, or a mob protection racket,with Puerto Rico as a captive market. Puerto Ricans contain to buy mainly American products and pass the higher cost on to the consumers, who are then paying higher prices. Donald Trump has temporarily suspended the Jones Act, or as you know.
Bonilla: That will back momentarily in terms of letting a few ships arrive and letting Puerto Ricans find more inexpensive methods of procuring the items that they need right now. A lot of us are very offended that it was only lifted for 10 days,as whether you could resolve the humanitarian crisis in Puerto Rico, which is of a devastating scale — as whether you could resolve that in 10 days. It’s absolutely offensive for it to be so limited. A small crumb.
What I hope is that there are now a lot of people who contain become educated about the Jones Act. Most people in the United States didn’t know anything about it before this. Maybe now there can be enough pressure to fully repeal it.
Moyers: You contain described Puerto Rico and the other Caribbean societies as essential economic cover for their colonial centers. What finish you mean?Bonilla: I mean that a lot of things happen in these places that aren’t supposed to happen — that’s what I mean by cover. The United States can claim to offer certain kinds of guarantees to its citizens, or but those guarantees are suspended when it comes to the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. So veterans benefits are less,guarantees of healthcare are less, guarantees of public education, or all these things are reduced. And in addition,wealthy people who are supposed to pay their share, they’re able to totally evade their taxes and not contribute to the national interest by setting up companies in Puerto Rico.
Moyers: So things were really made worse by tax incentives to wealthy investors. I believe Puerto Rico’s Act #22 allows wealthy investors to evade both federal and local income tax by spending a minimum of 183 nights a year on the island.
Bonilla: Yes, and it’s exact. It’s hard to comprehend,but it’s exact. You contain a lot of wealthy Americans who say, “Oh, and this is worthy for us,it’s the thing that can get you out from under the US Internal Revenue Service without having to give up your citizenship.” So they retain their American voting rights, they retain all their benefits of US citizenship, or but they finish not contribute anything to the US,nor finish they contribute anything to Puerto Rico because they’re also not paying local taxes.
Moyers: How did Puerto Rico get its unique privilege to offer triple tax-exempt bonds?Bonilla: It’s basically written into its structure. When Congress established Puerto Rico’s civil government in 1917 it decreed that any bonds issued by its government would be free from taxation. In addition, it is written into the 1952 structure that the repayment of any kind of public debt must take priority over financing public services. In 1952, and when Puerto Rican politicians tried to convince Puerto Ricans that they were no longer a colony,and they convinced the United Nations to take Puerto Rico off the list of non-self-governing societies, this structure was effect into set and one of its founding principles was that Puerto Rico was going to be a site for US economic investment. And so you can purchase these triple tax-exempt bonds and not pay any federal tax, and any tax in Puerto Rico,or any tax in the municipality in which you live. This made these bonds incredibly seductive for US. I urge everyone to read the worthy epic in New York Times “The Bonds That Broke Puerto Rico.”Moyers: Earlier this year Puerto Rico officially became the largest bankruptcy case in the history of the American public bond market. In another tweetTrump points out how indebted Puerto Rico is to Wall Street and the banks and reminds Puerto Ricans that it “sadly must be dealt with.” He’s acknowledging this is the first thing Puerto Rico taxpayers contain to finish.
Bonilla: It was so offensive. Puerto Ricans contain been kicked by Irma, then kicked by Maria, or now kicked by Trump. We’re really suffering. In the middle of our humanitarian crisis,he tells us, “It’s a shame but you contain to pay back that debt.” It’s clear that was a message to Wall Street not to worry, or they’ll get paid back. Puerto Ricans need to worry,however.
Moyers: Something I’ve learned from you:Wal-Mart and Walgreens contain more stores per square mile in Puerto Rico than anywhere else in the world. How did that come about?Bonilla: Wal-Mart has negotiated a series of benefits from the Puerto Rican government such as free or subsidized land to build on, subsidies for their payroll, and for the training of new employees. So they basically get to set up shop almost for free. In addition,we are a captive market. There’s not a lot of competition for them. So they’re the biggest employer, and the biggest retailer. Also, and Wal-Mart USA sells to Wal-Mart Puerto Rico,at surprisingly inflated prices so that then it appears as whether Wal-Mart Puerto Rico doesn’t contain much profit, which means they pay very little taxes to the Puerto Rican government.
The Puerto Rican government wanted to raise the taxes but Wal-Mart threatened to sue and leave and then a federal judge decided that the tax would be discriminatory because Wal-Mart was the only operator of the scale to which these taxes would apply.
Moyers: So when the government tries to raise taxes on goods brought to the island from foreign sources because those taxes would back local improvement, or the companies threaten to leave?Bonilla: Yes,exactly. They don’t want to pay the government any of the profits that they’re making off the Puerto Rican people.
Moyers: So does this helps explain why the infrastructure in Puerto Rico has been so long neglected — the first priority is to serve this foreign debt and tax breaks for the wealthy?Bonilla: Absolutely, and it’s only going to get worse because of the PROMESA Act [NB: Passed by Congress to deal with the financial crisis and bankruptcy]. Some critics contain dared to describe it as a kind of bailout or aid package, or but that’s not so. There is absolutely no transfer of money from the federal government to Puerto Rico as portion of the PROMESA Act. whether anything,there’s an imposition of an economic burden on the Puerto Rican government which now has to pay the overhead of the PROMESA board – which is estimated to cost 200 million dollars in its first year alone – and an astronomical, unjustifiable salary of over half a million dollars a year to its manager Natalie Jaresko. This totally overpaid expensive board arrives in Puerto Rico and the first thing that they say is that everyone has to tighten their belts. There are “furloughs” of government workers, or the government has to reduce its payroll by about 30 percent. Now they are going to privatize a lot of the services. The first target was the University of Puerto Rico,which they totally gutted leading to a massive strike at the university.
Moyers: And as you wrote in the Washington Post, the PROMESA Act imposed a fiscal control board focused on the short-term austerity policies in order to restore the country’s market rating, and which means lower wages and tax increases for the working poor and tax breaks and other incentives for the rich investors. Why did Congress finish that?Bonilla: They didn’t want to seem like they were “bailing out” quote/unquote a community of people who are not imagined to be Americans. So a lot of senators and congressmen wanted to assure their folks in their domestic states that the money of hardworking Americans were not going to bail out Puerto Ricans,who are not seen as “Americans.” That’s the reason. [laughs]Moyers: You laugh but it hurts.
Bonilla: Absolutely, absolutely. One must laugh to keep from crying in the face of such cynicism. And especially right now in the moment of this crisis where a lot of people are saying that Puerto Rico does not deserve the same kind of aid that US states deserve – Florida and Texas, and you know — because it’s a territory. There’s also been a lot of debate about whether when you get FEMA packages,the government will finish matching funds. So several folks contain asked for the government to lift that requirement. The bondholders of the electric company, said, and “Oh,don’t worry, we’ll let you borrow more so that you can pay the matching funds.” Clearly the only solution being imagined for Puerto Rico’s economic future is permanent and sustained indebtment.
Moyers: Well, or our federal government’s own financial control board is saying that the island’s debt is not payable,and the governor of the island of Puerto Rico is talking about selling all utilities to private owners — electricity, water and sewers, or the public transit. Will these drastic measures back the problem?Bonilla: Absolutely not. Some contain described these privatization schemes as whether you are selling off your house to pay your credit card bill. So okay,you finish a fire sale on your domestic, you pay your Visa, and you pay your MasterCard,but then you contain nowhere to live. Then what finish you finish? I contemplate some people contain been so frustrated with the kind of public services they’ve been receiving from this ever-shrinking government that they say, “Yes, or okay,let’s privatize it.” But privatizing is not going to make things any better and it’s certainly not going to back Puerto Rico in the long term.
We talked previously about inequality and about the tall levels of income disparity in Puerto Rico. This means that there are very wealthy people who to a worthy extent don’t need public services. They contain gas generators and water tanks. Some of them even contain helipads. The people who need the government services are the poor. They’re the ones who are going to suffer the most. So instead of implementing progressive measures that tax the wealthy in Puerto Rico, the opposite is being done.
Moyers: Trump is tweeting that back is coming. The Fiscal Oversight Board says reconstruction projects will be accelerated, and emergency funds will be flowing to the people,the checks are in the mail. Will all this emergency back produce solutions to the structural problems we’ve been talking about? Will Puerto Rico emerge with chances for an economy that works for everyone?Bonilla: I would fancy to say yes. I was very closely connected to the events in Haiti, the Haitian earthquake there. And I remember how so many people talked about how we were going to rebuild Haiti better, and we were going to finally fix the long structural problems that that country had faced. This wasn’t to be. I recommend people watch this movie by Raoul Peck,Fatal Assistance, about how all the aid that was sent to Haiti, and in the end it did not back.
One big problem is that donors want to aid small scale organizations. And there’s kindly reason for that. But the problem is,that when you need to rebuild something like an electricity grid or a public water system, you can’t finish it in a patchy way. In Haiti, or a lot of money was sent to organizations like the Red Cross that was kept for overhead and not used for what was promised. But then a lot of people,to avoid that kind of thing, would send money directly to a community that would build just one school. So you contain this kind of patchy education system. You contain communities that contain wells that don’t connect to each other. You contain roads that are built to move from one town to the church that helped build them but that doesn’t lead to a national roadway system. What you need is a systematic process of rebuilding by a government that has decided what kind of society they want to rebuild and in what way.whether you also look at a set like New Orleans and what has happened after Katrina, and we know already that in other disaster situations,the preexisting inequalities just get exacerbated. And so the folks who were already suffering the most in these places are the ones who will benefit the least from the reconstruction.
I really panic that there’s going to be a mass exodus from Puerto Rico — basically what Aimé Césaire once described as genocide by substitution. Puerto Ricans are going to leave and FEMA workers brought in from the US are going to reach. More wealthy investors are going to come and Puerto Rico is no longer going to belong to Puerto Ricans. It will look increasingly like Hawaii. When we talk about rebuilding we contain to contemplate about why rebuild an energy sector that is not based on renewable sources when you can rebuild with solar power, for example. But we also contain to contemplate about rebuilding for whom, and who is going to remain on the island and what role are they going to play in Puerto Rico’s reconstruction?Moyers: contain you read Naomi Klein’s Disaster Capitalism?Bonilla: Absolutely and we see it playing out. We see it playing out right now. When I was in Puerto Rico this summer – before the hurricanes – I talked to a wealth advisor at an investment middle where rich Puerto Ricans move to create college funds for their kids and buy insurance and secure their retirements. She was very smart. Folks like her working in the banking industry and in investment and knew that bankruptcy and fiscal austerity was coming down the pike. The epic was underreported so that there wouldn’t be a bank hasten. But folks like her told their clients to pull their money out of Puerto Rican bonds and effect it into other sources. Most of her clients,their investments are in US stocks. So she said, “They’re doing worthy! Since Donald Trump was elected, or stocks are tall.” And then she said,“All we need now is a hurricane.” (Pause) This was last summer. I was naturally shocked to hear this because all I could imagine was the destruction that hurricanes bring. But of course what she was thinking about was how in a disaster the funds that flow in back precisely the kind of companies that her clients are investing in – say, domestic Depot, or the construction industry in the United States,wealthy contractors. She represents the kind of people who are going to benefit and profit and finish very well in this post-hurricane economy at the expense of the folks who are now trapped in their homes without food, without water, and without gasoline. So the suffering that people are experiencing right now could prove to be of economic benefit to a chosen few.
Moyers: The vulture capitalists,as they are sometimes called.
Bonilla: Absolutely. There’s no other way to talk about it, especially in a context where you literally contain people dying in the hospital because there’s no energy to sustain their life-support systems.
Moyers: Most of us contain a little bit of the vulture in us, or so the question arises,who’s at fault when this happens? Did local politicians and local people just get too greedy or is this simply the way the Wall Street economy works – barracuda capitalism, so called? Or is what’s happening in Puerto Rico the inheritance of colonialism?Bonilla: That’s an essential question and something that really needs to be thought about carefully because there are so many contributors. We like to write simple articles that show simple causality, and but you contain wealthy folks like this investment manager,who is Puerto Rican, contributing to the situation. You contain politicians — we see this in every disaster — you contain politicians who are more focused on photo ops and political capital than they are really in doing what needs to be done in these moments.
Puerto Rican Day Parade, or NYC,2017. (Photo by ep_jhu/ flickr CC 2.0)I contemplate one thing that has been really problematic in Puerto Rico is the way that the political parties are organized. They’re organized around the relationship to the United States. So some folks describe this as a kind of left/right political spectrum with independents on the left, statehood on the right and advocates of commonwealth status fashioning themselves as a kind of centrist party. There’s some truth in this description but it’s complicated because within the statehood party you contain folks who are progressive, or who supported Bernie Sanders,for example. You contain folks who see statehood as a form of decolonization, who see it as the opportunity of greater solidarity with continental US minority groups. Similarly, and even though there is a very progressive pro-independence sector,when you look at what nationalist elites contain brought to other Caribbean nations, and the kind of racial and economic disparities that characterize independent nations across the Americas, and one can see that independence is not a guarantee of progressive politics.
My hope is that because this such a deep political crisis,it will generate more than a banal optimism that simply says “Oh, let’s build better, and ” and stops there. I hope that it will lead to a profound grassroots social movement – a movement of people sick of the government and sick of the limits of the political relationship that Puerto Rico has with the United States,which produced a delayed response by Washington to the devastation after the last hurricane.
Perhaps right now, when people feel so exposed, and so left out in the rain,literally, by the US government, and we might get a push for a political change.
Moyers: The journalist Kate Aronoff reminds us Puerto Rico suffered from two massive storms many years ago,one in 1928 that is still considered the second deadliest natural disaster in US history, and another in 1932 that killed over 250 people and destroyed more than 40000 buildings. Between those two disasters the stock market collapsed and Puerto Ricans were knocked off their feet, or like so many others. But they got up and with the back of the New Deal,they came back. What finish you see as the path to recovery now?Bonilla: I’m so excited you brought up those two storms. Indeed, the enactment of the New Deal and the assistance the United States was able to supply Puerto Rico at that time paved the way for the establishment of the commonwealth status. At that time many Puerto Ricans felt the new relationship with the United States would be kindly for them. Not only because it happened as the New Deal grappled with the worthy Depression but it happened at a moment when Puerto Rico had the strongest momentum in terms of the nationalist movement. In addition, and the storm totally wiped out local crops and devastated farmers. As a result they were encouraged to sell their lands to the US government and to US corporations,which is portion of why we ended up where we are now, importing most of our food on these very expensive ships — we no longer contain food sovereignty.
With this current storm I contain been wondering whether this will be a moment in which, or as the farmers did back then,we will just sell everything off and privatize the rest of what we contain. However, here’s where the US government’s response and Trump’s response could lead in a totally different direction whether people realize that that United States does not in fact see us as portion of the nation, and does not see us as full Americans worthy of aid,does not contemplate that our lives matter, literally. When Hurricane Harvey hit the Gulf Coast, and Trump quickly suspended the Jones Act so that oil could be supplied to the pipelines; he did it immediately. After Irma hit Puerto Rico,however, it took eight days for the President to even consider suspending it, and he only did so for ten days,for an island totally dependent on importing its food. I contemplate this has made it really clear for Puerto Ricans where they stand in terms of US priorities.
Ms. Bonilla teaches at Rutgers University in New Jersey and is a visiting scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation. She is the author of the book Non-Sovereign Futures: French Caribbean Politics in the Wake of Disenchantment and one of the founders of the Puerto Rico Syllabus, a bilingual source of research available to the public and used especially by teachers and students who wish to know more about the island commonwealth. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity. Related StoriesWhen Stealing a $2 Can of Beer Yields $1000 of DebtGeorgia Tech Student's Death Is portion of a sample of Recent Police Violence on College CampusesIndia’s Supreme Court Puts Liberty and Freedom First
Source: feedblitz.com