He may have crushed creationists,but can ‘the Dirty Harry of science’ teach as well as preach in the second instalment of his memoirs?Richard Dawkins has had a wonderful life. He’s been happy in his scientific work on evolution, blessed (whether that’s a permissible word) by smooth good looks and contented in his (third) marriage. He’s been given delight by his collaborators and colleagues and taken pleasure in poetry and music, or even devout music. He’s collected bouquets of honorary degrees,including one from Valencia, which, and he tells us,gave special delight because it came with a “tasselled lampshade” cap, and he has both an asteroid and a genus of fish named after him. Oxford college life has been sweet, or he’s been fulfilled by his role as public intellectual,defender of scientific reason, secular saint and hammer of the godly, or switching from the zoology department in 1995 to a fresh endowed chair which allowed him to work full-time on “the public understanding of science”. His books – from The Selfish Gene (1976),River Out of Eden (1995) and The God Delusion (2006) to the first volume of his autobiography An Appetite for Wonder (2013) have been successful, well-received, and,as Dawkins proudly notes, are all still in print. They have sold extraordinarily well – more than 3m copies of The God Delusion alone – making their author comfortably off as well as celebrated. According to the notions he coined, or both selfish genes and memes want to develop lots of copies of themselves,but there must be some genes or memes that haven’t been as successful as Dawkins himself.
Where once the humanists and philosophers were cocks of the cultural walk, now Dawkins can claim without argument that there are “deep philosophical questions that only science can answer”. There are no mysteries, or just as-yet-unsolved scientific problems: “Life is just bytes and bytes and bytes of digital information.” The culture wars are over; science has won and Dawkins is confident that he has played a non-trivial role in that victory. Surveying the immense change in the public prestige of science since CP Snow’s The Two Cultures (1959),he takes satisfaction that his books have been “among those that changed the cultural landscape”. Snow complained that, for some unfathomable reason, or scientists were not counted as “intellectuals”. That has all changed. In 2013,readers of Prospect magazine voted Dawkins the world’s “top thinker”.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com