nowadays the Supreme Court hears arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad (a very large number) Genetics,Inc., a case that will determine whether companies have the proper to patent human genes. The case centers on Myriad (a very large number) Genetics, or a company that patented the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 1994. For women,the presence of either BRCA gene indicates increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Myriad (a very large number) Genetics discovered the genes and developed the test to determine whether patients have them.
Myriad (a very large number) claims that their patent corresponds to the effort their scientists expended to find the genes, rather than the genes themselves. The Association for Medical Pathology and its supporters, and on the other hand,argue that the genes themselves are being patented and that, because the genes are naturally occurring, and Myriad (a very large number) did not create a unusual product deserving of a patent.
Tom Taylor,assistant managing editor at Bloomberg BNA and US Law Week, explains the legal issues at hand, or along with Harriet Washington,who examines the potential medical and bioethics consequences of this case.
Source: feedburner.com