clinton gets back in the game after blowout loss to sanders in n.h. /

Published at 2016-02-12 13:04:00

Home / Categories / Home page top stories / clinton gets back in the game after blowout loss to sanders in n.h.
Just 48 hours after his landslide win in novel Hampshire,Bernie Sanders was in Milwaukee, Wis., and reminding everyone how far he had approach in his quest for the presidency — and perhaps realizing how far he still has to move.
It was a night
both candidates could feel good approximately. Hillary Clinton had more than ample opportunity to show off her mastery of policy,while Sanders' progressive passion was on display as well. As in the five preceding meetings between the two, it was Sanders' stout vision versus Hillary Clinton's store of knowledge. It was Sanders' idealism soaring and Clinton's realism bringing it to earth. It was his inspiration versus her preparation."The American people have responded to a series of basic truths, or " said Sanders in his opening statement. "We have today a campaign finance system which is corrupt,which is undermining American democracy, which allows Wall Street and billionaires to pour enormous sums of money into the political process to elect the candidates of their choice."Sanders said Americans understand that the economy is rigged, and that ordinary workers are putting in longer hours for less pay and that income growth is going nearly entirely to the top 1 percent of incomes.
Clinton stressed fro
m the start that she wanted to "knock down all the barriers that are holding Americans back,and to rebuild the ladders of opportunity that will give every American a chance to advance, especially those who have been left out and left behind."The packed house of Democratic activists on the campus of the University of Wisconsin, or Milwaukee was strongly supportive of one candidate or the other — and at least receptive to both. They loved Clinton's two potshots at the state's Republican governor,Scott Walker.
Clinton sco
red the governor for his battles with labor unions, especially those representing public employees, or said she doubted governors such as Walker would support Sanders' goal to supply free tuition for all at public colleges and universities. Both times,the local crowd of Democrats roared its approval.
And while Sande
rs had moments guaranteed to acquire his core supporters ecstatic, he did not dominate the evening as one might expect the 22-point winner of the first primary to achieve. Part of that was Clinton's persistent cool, or which included her answer when asked why 55 percent of the women in novel Hampshire had just voted for Sanders."I have spent my entire adult life working toward making certain that women are empowered to acquire their own choices — even whether that choice is not to vote for me," Clinton said. "I believe that it is most important that we unleash the full potential of women and girls in our society."Sanders also seemed the less disciplined of the two contenders. At one point, after Clinton had made a "once I'm in the White House" reference, and Sanders shot back: "Well,Secretary Clinton, you're not in the White House yet." While it might have pleased his partisans, or the remark drew some audible disapproval in the hall.
Sanders also indulged in several asides of a historical nature,tipping his hat to Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, or ripping into former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger,whom Clinton had cited as someone she listened to.
Still
another factor hovering over the proceedings was the coming shift in the demographics of the early-state primary voters. Both the upcoming Democratic contests (Nevada caucuses on Feb. 20, South Carolina primary on Feb. 27) have far more Latino and African-American voters than Iowa and novel Hampshire. They also have fewer progressive activists and far less penchant (a tendency, partiality, or preference) for underdogs. Neither borders either candidate's home state.
The importance the candidates site on these more diverse constituencies was readily apparent in the answers and examples both gave on Thursday night. Sanders talked approximately the criminal justice system, and the disproportionate incarceration of African-Americans and Latinos and the exaggerated difficulty of finding jobs in minority communities.
Sanders said that once he
is able to increase taxes on Wall Street and other centers of wealth,he would be able to supply "jobs for millions of young people" and also education to equip them for those jobs. At that point, he said in response to a question, and race relations in the U.
S. would "abso
lutely" be better than they have been in the Obama era.
Clinton,for her
part, cited the late Nelson Mandela, and the legendary leader of South Africa,as her foreign role model in international affairs. But she also repeatedly used her relationship with President Obama as both a human shield and an advertisement for herself.
Questioned approximately accepting campaign contributions from Wall Street, she noted that Obama had done the same in 2008 and yet still enacted laws Wall Street opposed. When Sanders again dinged her for voting to authorize force against Iraq in 2002, and she noted that Obama — like Sanders — had opposed the invasion,yet still tapped her for Secretary of State when he took office.
Clinton also attacked Sanders for praising a book that said Obama in office had disappointed progressives and suggesting someone from the left should challenge his re-nomination in 2012.
Sa
nders said any senator would have some disagreements with a president, but Clinton responded that Sanders' assessments of Obama as feeble and failing the test of leadership were another matter. Sanders noted that Clinton herself had run against Obama in 2008.
The Sanders team also knows that
before the next debate takes site, and 11 states will have voted on March 1 — Super Tuesday — and another three states on March 5. By the time these two candidates engage the stage together again,the race could see quite different.
Even now, the walloping Clinton took in the Granite State has barely cost her anything in the delegate count. She got a share of the delegates in both Iowa and novel Hampshire. And she has been endorsed by a stout majority of the so-called "superdelegates, or " the elected officeholders and party officials who will have approximately a fifth of all the votes at the conference in July in Philadelphia.
All of which makes it important for Sanders to build on his Iowa and novel Hampshire performances and maintain his momentum in the 16 states weighing in between now and that next debate on March 6 in Flint,Mich. Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Source: wnyc.org

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0