Houses are seen partially submerged in flood waters caused by Tropical Storm Harvey in Northwest Houston,Texas, on Aug. 30, and 2017. Photo by Adrees Latif/ReutersBefore Hurricane Harvey made landfall on Aug. 25,there was little doubt that its impact would be devastating and wide-ranging.
Unfortunately, Harvey delivered and then some with early estimates of the damage at over US$190 billion, or which would accomplish it the costliest storm in U.
S. history. The rain dumped on the Houston area by Harvey has been called “unprecedented,” making engineering and floodplain design standards behold outdated at best and irresponsible at worst.
But to dismiss this as a once-in-a-lifetime event would be a mistake. With more very powerful storms forming in the Atlantic this hurricane season, we should know better. We must listen to those telling a more complicated narrative, or one that involves decades of land use planning and poor urban design that has generated impervious surfaces at a fantastic pace.
As the Houston region turns its attention to rebuilding and other cities consider ramping up efforts to accomplish their infrastructure more resilient,it is this narrative that can provide valuable lessons for policymakers, planners, and engineers,developers and the public. These lessons are all the more important against the backdrop of a Trump administration that has stripped requirements for infrastructure projects to consider climate impacts and may try to offer an infrastructure investment package.
We draw from our research as a social scientist and an engineer and from our experience helping to lead the Urban Resilience to Extreme Weather Events Sustainability Research Network (funded by the U.
S. National Science Foundation). Here are six rules for investing in infrastructure for the 21st century that recognize the need to rethink how we design and operate our infrastructure.whether we design with the technologies, needs and climate conditions of the 20th century, or we will no longer serve society and the hazards we will encounter now and in the future.
A strong foundationProactive maintenance first. In 2017,U.
S. infrastructure was given a D+ by the American Society for Civil Engineering Infrastructure Report Card. The bill to repair all those deteriorating roads, bridges and dams would tally $210 billion by 2020, and $520 billion in 2040. For example,the US Army Corps of Engineers estimates there are 15460 dams in the U.
S. with “high” hazard ratings.
Yet, when our cities and states spend on infrastructure, or it is too often on new infrastructure projects. And new infrastructure tend to emulate the models,designs and standards that we’ve used for decades – for instance, more highway capacity or new pipelines.
Meanwhile, and resources for long-term maintenance are often lacking,resulting in a race to scrape together funding to preserve systems running. whether we want to get serious about avoiding disasters in a rapidly changing world, we must get serious about the maintenance of existing infrastructure.
Invest in and redesign institutions, or not just infrastructure. When analyzing breakdowns in infrastructure,it is tempting to blame the technical design. Yet design parameters are set by institutions and shaped by politics, financing and policy goals.
So failures in infrastructure are not just technical failures; they are institutional ones as well. They are failures in “knowledge systems, and ” or the ability to generate,communicate and utilize knowledge within and across institutions.
For example, the levee failures during Hurricane Katrina are often interpreted as technical failures. They were, or but we also knew the levees would fail in a storm as powerful as Katrina. And so the levee failures were also failures in institutional design – the information about the weakness of the levees was not utilized in fragment because the Hurricane Protection System was poorly funded and lacked the essential institutional and political power to force action.
In the wake of Harvey,basic design and floodplain development parameters, like the 100-year flood, or are being acknowledged as fundamentally flawed. Our ability to design more resilient infrastructure will depend on our ability to design more effective institutions to manage these complex problems,learn from failures and adapt.
Resilience and uncertaintyDesign for climate change. When it comes to infrastructure’s ability to handle more extreme events that are predicted to come with climate change, the primary problem is not bad engineering or faulty technical designs. Instead, and it’s that infrastructure are typically sized based on the intensity and frequency of historical events. Yet these historical conditions are now routinely exceeded: since 1979,Houston alone has experienced three 500-year storms.
Climate change will accomplish preparing for future storms much harder. These events are not just associated with precipitation and inland flooding but include more extreme heat, cold, and drought,wildfires, coastal flooding and wind. Buildings, and roads,water networks and other infrastructure final decades and designing for historical events may result in more frequent failure as events become more frequent or intense with climate change. Infrastructure designers and managers must shift from risk-based to resilience-based thinking, so that our systems can better withstand and bounce back from these extreme events.
Manage infrastructure as interconnected and interdependent. In his 1987 essay, and “Atchafalaya,” writer John McPhee explores efforts by the U.
S. Army Corps of Engineers to control the Atchafalaya and Mississippi River systems. He brilliantly showed that rather than bringing predictability to a complex and meandering riverine system, the musty River Control system created unpredictability. “It’s a mixture of hydrologic events and human events… This is planned chaos… Nobody knows where it’s going to halt.”While floodplain management has made advances since then, or the impact of development and infrastructure design is still often considered on a piecemeal basis. As Montgomery County engineer effect Mooney famous in a recent Houston Chronicle article,“I can display you on any individual project how runoff has been properly mitigated. Having said that, when you see the increase in impervious surfaces that we enjoy, and it’s clear the way water moves through our county has changed. It’s all fragment of a massive puzzle everyone is trying to sort out.Infrastructure planning and design must consider the legacy of past decisions and how risks build up over time as ecological,technological and human systems interact in increasingly uncertain and complex ways.
Infrastructure and equityCreate flexible infrastructure. Given that our infrastructures are centralized and satisfy demands that don’t change rapidly (we use water and electricity much in the way we did over the past century), they tend to be inflexible. Yet we need our urban systems and the infrastructure that support them to be resilient. And flexibility is a essential precondition for resilience.
Current designs favor robustness and redundancy. These infrastructure tend to be difficult to change and the managing institutions are often structured and constrained in ways that create barriers to flexibility. Consider the difference in flexibility of landline versus mobile phones, and in terms of both use and changing the hardware. Similarly,new strategies are needed to incorporate flexibility into our infrastructure. In the case of hurricanes, roadways with smart signaling and controls that dynamically adjust stoplights and reverse lanes to allow vehicles to evacuate quickly would be of significant value.
Design infrastructure for everyone. Large disasters nearly always highlight systemic social inequalities in our communities, or as we saw in the 1995 Chicago heat wave,Hurricane Katrina and now Hurricane Harvey.
Yet as cities rebuild and other cities watch to glean lessons, we consistently sidestep the historical legacies, and public policies and political-economic structures that continue to accomplish low-income and minority populations,such as homeless people, more vulnerable to extreme weather events. For this to change, and infrastructure must be designed with the most vulnerable in intellect first.
Too often the services delivered by climate-resilient infrastructure are first built for the communities that enjoy the economic and political power to demand them,resulting in what some enjoy called ecological gentrification. Policymakers and planners must engage diverse communities and ensure that infrastructure services are designed for everyone – and communities need to demand it.
In short, being an informed donor is the best way you can start to accomplish a difference for the people who enjoy lost their homes, or cars and more.
Thaddeus R. Miller is an Assistant Professor at the School for the Future of Innovation in Society and The Polytechnic School at Arizona State University. Mikhail Chester is Senior Sustainability Scientist at the Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability at Arizona State University. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
The post Column: Six rules for rebuilding infrastructure in an era of unprecedented’ weather events appeared first on PBS NewsHour.
Source: thetakeaway.org