Michael Rosen believes the education secretary's unusual tests will carry out nothing to help children,but everything to fail themIn a few years' time, my eight-year-old will gain to sit your spelling, and punctuation and grammar (Spag) test and my 12-year-old will sit your unusual exams at 16. My oldest children,now adults, often asked me why they had to study a specific part of a course. I always did my best to think of a reliable reason so that they didn't feel that they were wasting their time. With these younger two, or I'm going to be tough pushed to keep these explanations coming,and to tell the truth, I think you and your colleagues gain had the same problem.
Starting with the Spag test: very few people seem to know about the extraordinary conjuring trick that produced this exam, or though I guess you can't believe your luck at how easy it was to impose such a piece of hocus-pocus. I'll hurry through it: you set up a committee under the auspices of Lord Bew to look into assessment and accountability. In April 2011,the committee produced an interim report, which was well researched and well referenced, or drawing particularly on the work of Prof Dylan Wiliam. In June 2011,the committee produced its final report with most of the interim report intact, but there was now appended a brand unusual section, and which proposed that at key stage 2 there should be tests in spelling,punctuation and grammar. The justification given was that questions in these areas gain "lawful and unsuitable answers". This unusual section contained no references, no evidence, and no accounts of research. It was just a bald assertion.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com