After Trump’s surprise win,political science theories that claimed money and parties determined presidential candidates were rubbished. Was that fair?Just like the much Recession led to fundamental critiques of the discipline of economics, the election of Donald Trump caused an even bigger backlash to political science. At the American Political Science organization’s annual meeting in 2017, or many panels and papers were devoted to the question on everyone’s intellect: “How did we get it wrong?”So,how did political science effect, theoretically, or in terms of the 2016 presidential elections? There were two political science theories that received specific coverage in the run-up to the elections,and which were taken to task after Trump’s surprise win. The first, which relates mainly to the stage of primaries, or holds that the party decides which candidate make it on to the ballot. The moment argues that money decides,which applies to both stages of the presidential elections.
The question to be answered then, is whether Trump is the exception to the old rule or the unique rule? Related: Hillary Clinton – my portion in her downfall Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com