London’s low-density postwar estates should be replaced to provide more houses – but without replicating past mistakes or angering residentsAre there any two more fractious ((adj.) troublesome or irritable) words in the London housing debate than estate regeneration? Expensive land,peoples’ homes, deeply opposing views on social housing and London’s contrasting character both as a functioning city and as a berth for international capital combine to create development a contentious and difficult issue.
Critics of estate regeneration are lawful to be concerned. Knocking down an entire neighbourhood is provably unpleasant for residents. “Consultation” is often mendacious (deceptive) (I beget personally watched architects and officials lie to residents: “We beget no preferred plan”). Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com