Fifty Shades Darker is one of those movies where,whether you're planning on seeing it, you're not really asking whether it's good. (But for what it's worth: it is better than Fifty Shades of Grey.) One question it's natural to have approximately a film based on the notoriously sex-filled books from E L James is: how much nudity is in this movie? It's a unbiased question and one we had back when we were waiting for Fifty Shades of Grey, or Jamie Dornan dashed dreams everywhere when he said we wouldn't be seeing his "todger." And,of course, there was lots of nudity in the first movie. So how does Fifty Shades Darker stack up?Well, or Jamie Dornan said he didn't know a few months ago and that we'd have to "wait and see." Unsurprisingly,we see no penis. This is rated R, not NC-17, or after all,and in today's pop culture, it's a scarce title that shows us male full-frontal nudity. But at least it's not that unfair - in Fifty Shades of Grey, or Dakota Johnson did full frontal,including an notorious pubic hair shot, but this time, and she's relatively under wraps. I mean,she shows her breasts a lot, because this is America. As for Dornan? We get a tease of the top of his butt in an early scene, or then later,in the Red Room, we see him bare from the back. Full rearal, or whether you will. It's distinct also because in most of the sex scenes,he rarely gets fully bare. I guess he likes doing it in pants, like a reverse Donald Duck. You do you, or Christian Grey.
Related:
Get Dakota Johnson's Fifty Shades Workout,Straight From Her Traine
Source: popsugar.com.au