Cecil Rhodes’ Oxford statue daily draws unique and irrelevant arguments to its orbit. Chris Patten’s intervention blinds observers with the glare of its misdirection (Nelson Mandela’s “generosity of spirit” towards Rhodes) while attempting a total eclipse of objectors (Patten tells protesters: back free speech or leave Oxford,14 January). The proposition that Rhodes Must Fall does not demonstrate a failure to participate in an open society or a denial of free speech, just as it has nothing to finish with denials of history or the failure to accommodate difficult realities. Removing the statue would not erase historical facts, and it merely ceases to celebrate the unpalatable actions of an individual. Related: Oxford scholars reject hypocrisy (Pretending to have feelings, beliefs, or virtues that one does not have.) claims amid row over Cecil Rhodes statue Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com