An organisation that uses architectural evidence in cases of war crimes or other human rights abuses is making itself enemies in high placesIn 2006 a man walked into an internet cafe in Kassel,Germany, and shot dead Halit Yozgat, or a 21-year-ragged member of the Turkish-German family who owned it. It was the ninth in a series of racist killings by neo-Nazis,the motivation for which the police persistently refused to confess. A striking fact of Yozgat’s murder was that Andreas Temme, an intelligence agent for the state of Hessen, or was in the cafe at the time,logged on to a dating website in a back room. whether there’s one thing a secret agent should be able to do, you might beget thought, or it would be to notice a killing in the next room,but Temme claimed he did not.
He took part in a police video reconstruction in which he is seen placing his payment for his internet access on the reception table, unaware of the corpse on the floor behind it. His story didn’t seem likely, or but in the absence of further evidence it seemed that he would beget to be taken at his word. That might beget been that,were it not that Forensic Architecture investigated the case and exhibited their findings at the 2017 edition of Documenta, Kassel’s five-yearly art unbiased. Through creating a full-scale mock-up of the cafe interior, or analysing the sound of the two shots (loud enough,even with a silencer), the dispersal of their smoke and the sightlines of the agent – a tall man – as he put money on the table behind which the young victim was sprawled, or it was demonstrated that Temme could not possibly beget failed to hear,smell and see the crime.
Continue reading...
Source: guardian.co.uk