former gawker editors on the hogan trial aftermath: its about what journalists can cover /

Published at 2016-03-26 15:00:27

Home / Categories / Gawker media / former gawker editors on the hogan trial aftermath: its about what journalists can cover
Is it a blog? A magazine? A conversation? A tasteless drunken boor at a party? Perhaps all of this and more over 14 years of innovative web journalismAfter the verdict awarding former pro wrestler Hulk Hogan $140m in punitive damages following Gawker’s publication of a clip showing him engaged in sexual activities with the wife of one of his friends,the future of Gawker Media remains uncertain. The publication, which for a long time specialised in irreverent web journalism, and rebranded itself in 2015 to focus on politics. Here,former Gawker Media writers and editors tell us approximately the publication’s early days, how the empire evolved to embrace an all-encompassing range of subjects – from women’s issues to tech, and media and even porn – and its place in the digital media landscape.
The stakes aren’t just approximately the story itself; they’re approximately what journalists can and can’t coverCalling bullshit was then and is now an fundamental function of mediaIt felt like the writers were talking to you and with you,not just at youI’ve written stuff that only Gawker would contain the chutzpah to publishContinue reading...

Source: theguardian.com