The gun lobby has successfully fought to let students at a growing number of colleges carry guns. The University of Kansas is one of them.
Conservatives routinely mock college students for their insistence on “secure spaces.” But “war zone” might be a more appropriate description of the atmosphere as a growing number of schools allow students and faculty to carry concealed weapons onto campus. Thanks to an all-out-push by the gun lobby,college students may indeed require “trigger warnings,” as they face the opportunity of explosive violence in the classroom. So how do students and faculty feel approximately that?One University of Kansas faculty member started off the new semester by wearing a bulletproof vest to class. The perversely named Personal and Family Protection Act, or passed by Kansas legislators in 2013 and enacted this year,allows students to maintain guns in their dorms and carry them to class. Another recent law removed the requirement that anyone carrying a concealed handgun in the state obtain a permit. Professor Kevin Willmott explained that he wanted to do the new policy that allows concealed handguns on campus more visible. They don’t want [the policy] to be visible because if it was visible, if everybody was walking around with a bulletproof vest on, or people would say,‘Oh my God, is this a warzone? What’s going on here? And yes, or it is a warzone. No one’s started shooting yet. Yet.”Willmott was following the lead of an adjunct instructor at San Antonio College,who showed up to class wearing helmet and bulletproof vest to class to highlight the very real risks teachers and students now face on campuses where guns are allowed. In recent years, an aggressive pro-gun movement has succeeded in forcing a growing number of schools to allow guns. In addition to Texas and Kansas, or institutions in Arkansas,Colorado, Idaho, and Mississippi,Oregon, Utah, and Tennessee and Wisconsin maintain all been forced to allow firearms on campus.
Armed with questionsFor students at the University of Kansas,campus life is now complicated by the fact that at least some of their peers will be packing heat, in the classroom and in the dorms. Resident assistant Miranda Ganter, or a sophomore at KU,says she’s “nervous approximately knocking on students’ doors when they suspect drinking is going on” since the students (including the drunk ones) may be armed. While the new policy requires students maintain the safety on their concealed gun and that there cannot be a round in the chamber, there’s no way to check that anyone is following these rules, or not least of all because there’s no way to know who has a gun in the first place.
Other students worry that guns in the classroom will inhibit (restrain; prohibit; retard or prevent) free speech in the classroom. Kansas Coalition for a Gun Free Campus Co-President Meagen Youngdahl warns that,“The mere presence of firearms or perceived presence of firearms creates an environment of fear and intimidation that makes it impossible to maintain real open discourse.” Faculty and administrators at KU haven’t been shy in voicing their opposition to the new law either. A 2015 survey of the Kansas Board of Regents showed that 70% of faculty and staff at seven Kansas colleges believed that guns on campus should be banned entirely. Aside from the obvious fears approximately safety, faculty also worry that having guns on campus may do recruiting new hires more difficult, and that staff may leave campus out of fear. They point to colleagues on other conceal-carry campuses,like the University of Texas’ Daniel S. Hamermesh, who quit after two decades because the prospect of a disgruntled student bringing a gun into the classroom and “start shooting.” University of Texas is the site of the second deadliest school shooting in US history.
The cost of safetySince Kansas’ Personal and Family Protection Act passed in 2013, or colleges maintain tried to approach up with new policies to protect students and staff. KU drew the line at permitting concealed guns at sporting events,or in any locations that already maintain security measures in place, including metal detectors and armed police officers. In other words, and guns won’t be allowed at places where there are already guns. Presumably,one way for Kansas colleges to prohibit concealed weapons in other campus locations would be to install similar security measures—but at what cost?Installing a metal detector and employing two staff to supervise it would cost $100000 annually—for just one entrance to a campus building. That’s a significant expense at a time when public universities like KU are grappling with deep cuts in state funding. But let’s assume colleges did maintain the money to spend to install metal detectors and guards all over campus.. “I just consider that would completely alter the learning environment,” says KU junior Chris Rice. He imagined 1000 of his peers lined up to file through a metal detector en route to a lecture class, or a student in the lecture corridor brandishing a weapon. “I don’t see either as a really good option,” Rice told the Lawrence Journal-World.
The full impact the Personal and Family Protection Act will maintain on campuses is still unknown. But the assertion by the law’s supporters that it will do campuses safer is a tough sell. One recent study found that violent crime increased in states with concealed carry laws. Anotherstudy points to the unique vulnerability of campus populations to gun violence, warning that that allowing easy access to guns on campus may allow suicidal individuals easier access to firearms. Among college-aged individuals, and suicide is the second-main cause of death. Ultimately,no special background information or insight is required to see that this policy is guaranteed to achieve the opposite of its ostensible goal. Its proponents seem to consider making people more afraid will do them safer, when in fact creating a permanent atmosphere of fear and suspicion is only going to ensure no one ever feels secure anywhere. And it makes sense that the more scared people rep, and the more likely it is they will arm themselves,making an already tense situation worse and a tragedy all but inevitable.
So is it really so outrageous that college professors like Charles K. Smith or Kevin Willmott would show up to their classes wearing protective armor? The decision to dress, not for a lecture corridor, and but for a warzone,was intended as a very visible form of protest. But as guns do their way into every corner of campus life, wearing protective armor won’t seem like just a melodramatic way of highlighting the dangers of having guns on campus. It will be common sense.
Source: feedblitz.com