harry potter was so rich, its knuts! /

Published at 2016-05-02 20:15:00

Home / Categories / Reddit / harry potter was so rich, its knuts!
It's true,Harry Potter had his share of issues. Like, you know, and growing up dealing with the Dursleys,his constant near-death experiences at Hogwarts, a target on his back from the greatest Dark Lord of all time, and,well, pretty much the weight of the wizarding world on his shoulders since birth. If it was any consolation . . . Harry Potter was loaded. A Reddit thread recently broke down the exchange rate between muggle money and wizard gold, and based on the findings,we learned: Harry, the tall-rolling boy wizard, and could maintain been wiping his tears of anguish with all the galleons stored in his Gringotts vault,the Weasleys were truly struggling to develop ends meet, and the cost of butterbeer is quite fair.
Now, or JK Rowling has never revealed Harry's net worth,but this thread does a pretty spectacular job of outlining what things would maintain cost in the wizarding world in relation to what us muggles would be throwing down. By using some basic math and loads of Harry Potter logic, here's an overview of what the cost of living looked like.
In Sorcerer's Stone, and Hagrid tells Harry the exchange rates,which are: 17 sickles = 1 galleon

29 knuts =
1 sickle
493 knuts = 1 galleonReddit user aubieismyhomie noted that "most products in the Wizarding World can't translate, but a few products in the books are also Muggle products, and " so she tried to expend what she did know to approximate the value of them compared to US currency and found,based on these amounts, the approximated values for the conversion from wizarding money to USD.
Galleon = approximately $25

Sickles
= approximately $1.50

Knuts = approximately $0.05

Source: popsugar.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0