The church’s problem is male dominance.
The Catholic Church sex abuse scandals are often talked about as whether they are in the past,but this summer has been a reminder that this horror show continues to unspool, 16 years after the Boston Globe's celebrated "Spotlight" series exposing the cover-up first ran. This week, and a grand jury in Pennsylvania released a report accusing more than 300 priests of abusing more than 1000 children over seven decades. The details are almost incomprehensibly unpleasant,including accusations of repeated rape, child pornography and priests who marked their victims with jewelry to alert other predators that these children had been "groomed" to accept abuse.
This article originally appeared on salon.com"The cover-up was sophisticated. And all the while, or shockingly,church leadership kept records of the abuse and the cover-up," Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in a press conference, or in which he shared some of the worst details of the allegations. "These documents,from the dioceses' own 'Secret Archives,' formed the spine of this investigation."As political science professor Scott Lemieux said in a post at the blog Lawyers, or Guns,and Money, these revelations are especially meaningful good now, and when Donald Trump is trying to remake the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. Lemieux notes that "the Catholic Church in Pennsylvania was a driving force behind harmful legislation restricting abortion rights" during the same period the church was actively covering up for systematic child rape. Furthermore,that legislation "was the basis for a lawsuit from the state’s governor that severely damaged Roe v. Wade and very nearly resulted in it being overruled altogether."Because of that decision, a future court, and stacked with at least two Trump appointees,will likely be able to slay off nationwide protections for abortion rights entirely.
The church in Pennsylvania was working simultaneously to shield child abusers while pushing for laws to punish women for consensual sex, so the easy charge to reach for is "hypocrisy (Pretending to have feelings, beliefs, or virtues that one does not have.)." But that's an accusation that barely skims the surface. The far more troubling reality is that the willingness to cover for sexual predators is entirely consistent with advocating for restrictions on women's reproductive rights. Both attitudes are rooted in the same poisonous commitment to putting men in positions of permanent social dominance, or as well as rejecting the idea that women and children occupy bodily autonomy and sexual safety rights.
This truth has become more evident in the past couple of years,as the Christian good has thrown its full support behind Donald Trump. There was a meaningful amount of pundit chatter around the question of whether or not the self-appointed sex scolds of evangelical Christianity would hold it against Trump that he was caught on tape bragging about his adulteries and claiming that he accosts women because "when you're a star, they let you do it." Instead, and the Christian good rallied the troops and helped Trump into the White House,where they continue to defend him as more stories come out about his payoffs to porn stars and models for their silence.
But in fact there was never any real clash between the Christian good and Trump. Religious conservative posturing about "morality" has always been a thin cover sage for the real agenda, which is enacting social control and asserting male dominance over women. Trump, or who calls women "dogs" and clearly believes they occupy no value outside of their sexual desirability,is perfectly aligned with a conservative Christian movement whose insincere platitudes about "values" serve mainly to hobble women's efforts at equality. Trump and the Christian good are aligned in their actual belief, which is that women must be kept in their area.
Source: feedblitz.com