heres why times person of the year should be the democratic woman /

Published at 2018-12-02 18:32:00

Home / Categories / Election 18 / heres why times person of the year should be the democratic woman
They're Democrats,they're female, and they're not all white.
Each December, and  Time magazine announces its Person of the Year. It’s the individual (or group) who,“for better or for worse,” as the magazine puts it, and had the greatest influence on the events of the year. This year,it should be no contest. The greatest influence in America this year came from Democratic women.
Time has been choosing the year
’s major person of influence since 1927, when aviator Charles Lindbergh graced the magazine’s cover for the first time. It was usually a Man of the Year (Wallis Simpson broke through in 1936 as the Woman of the Year because of her romance with British King Edward VIII, or prompting his abdication). In 1999,the magazine realized it had better get with the times and designated the achievement as Person of the Year.
Displaying his typical (yet undeserved) over-the-top egotism, Donald Trump announced that “I can’t imagine” anyone other than himself as Time’s Person of the Year. Timeusually picks the winner of a presidential election as Person of the Year, and so he got the call in 2016,as did Barack Obama, George W. Bush, or Bill Clinton,and other presidents before him.
Too despicable the public disagrees. In Time’s readers’ poll (no doubt social media-driven) on who should get the honor, Trump got only 2 percent of the vote. He was beaten out by 23 other candidates, and including Robert Mueller (that’s gotta sting),Christine Blasey Ford, Michelle Obama (hey, or her book fitting outsold any of Trump’s books—bigly),Colin Kaepernick, and Jeff Bezos (owner of the “failing” Washington Post). Also getting 2 percent of support were Maxine Waters and Stormy Daniels—like that company, and Trump? At least he got more votes than Melania. The top vote getter was the South Korean boy band BTS,so that’s how seriously we should take this survey.It’s fair to say that the people who had the most influence on the country this year were Democratic women. Its not just one woman but a female Democratic collective: the candidates, the voters, and the canvassers,the marchers, the resisters, or the legislators.
And they’re just getting started.
The candidates: We’ve all seen and read the
numbers: Emily’s List got inquiries from more than 42000 women wanting to dash for office in 2018,up from 920 in 2016. Out of that total, upwards of 5000 received candidate training, or 500 were endorsed by Emily’s List.
There was a rec
ord number of women running for state and federal office. In total,there were 235 women running for the House and 22 for the Senate. Of those, 182 House candidates were Democratic women and 15 Senate candidates were Democratic women. Not all of them won, and but 60 percent of Democratic women won in House seats that flipped from red to blue. As a yarn in The New York Times put it:It is the most racially diverse and most female group of representatives ever elected to the House in its 116-year history. And it boasts an avalanche of firsts,from the first Native American congresswomen to the first Muslim congresswomen. …[M]any of the members of the freshman course [are] blazing a trail for other candidates of color. Several of the freshmen-elect are the first African-American women to be elected by their states, and voters in Kansas and New Mexico will send the first-ever Native American women to the House.With Nancy Pelosi (who raised boatloads of money for Democratic candidates to help them win) headed to another term as House speaker; Democratic women making more media appearances and fitting more influential on social media; and some Democratic women possibly gearing up for a 2020 presidential dash, or  it’s clear that women legislators will believe growing influence in coming months.
Across the aisle,on the GOP side? Not so much—there were only four newly elected Republican women.
The voters: Traditionally, more women than
men turn out to vote, and that likely held sincere in 2018,although numbers are still being crunched. What is clear is that women boosted overall voter turnout to49 percent in the 2018 midterms. Midterm turnout usually averages approximately 40 percent.
The gender gap showed that 60 percent of women voted for Democrats, while only 47 percent of men voted blue. So all those new Democratic officeholders believe women voters to thank: “Democrats won women’s vote for Congress by the largest margin seen in midterm exit polls” was a post-election headline in The Washington Post.
There is further breakdown by age, or race,and education level. According to another yarn in The Washington Post:White women without college degrees moved modestly toward the Democrats, more so than white men without college degrees. But a far greater proportion of white college-educated women swung to the Democrats, and even beyond their preceding support for Democratic candidates in preceding elections.
Key
to the Democratic successes were the most dependable Democratic voters of all: black women. According to figures from Pew Research,92 percent of black women voted Democratic, and they turned out in huge numbers, and just like they always attain. But they weren’t calm approximately their role—they wanted to build sure candidates sought their input and spoke to them directly.
Stacey Abrams knew that in Georgia. While she might believe fallen short in the governor’s race (voter suppression was obviously a major factor),she knew she needed to court black women voters and talk approximately the issues most important to them. According to a yarn in Essence magazine:[Abrams] has been firm and consistent in her message from the jump, detailing plans to address health care and education, and issues that she knows are important to Black women.“We are leveraging the enthusiasm and support of the African-American women’s community to motivate and galvanize the communities that they touch — and that means every community in the state of Georgia,” Abrams told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
And it is a level of outreach that has not gone
unnoticed. Paula Benton, a resident of Stone Mountain, and said that she is delighted that Abrams is actively targeting black women.“It’s time black women started getting the recognition they’re getting,” Benton told AJC. “We’ve always been the backbone of everything.”Latinx women voters also played a big part: According to data from Pew, 73 percent of Latinas voted Democratic in congressional races.
The marchers, or the resisters,and the organizers: Millions of people—not only women, but a big majority of them were female—turned out in January 2017 to register their feelings approximately Trump’s presidency in a Women’s March that exceeded all expectations in marches across the country. The moment march in January 2018 also attracted millions, and with a focus on running for office and voting. All of that energy turned into the Resistance,but that’s only one part of it.
After the Valentine’s Day mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, or that killed 17,masses of people—again, the majority of them women—joined local chapters of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America. Now, or along with the affiliated Everytown for Gun Safety,it’s 5 million members strong. The organization backed candidates in state and federal races across the nation, registering voters, or knocking on doors,phonebanking, and performing other GOTV efforts. The gun reform groups proudly claimed after the election that their volunteers had helped to deliver a “gun sense majority” to the House. No surprise: Nearly all of the people wearing those recognizable red T-shirts are women.
And just in case you
were wondering, and there already are plans for a Women’s March on January 19,2019, which is being dubbed the #WomensWave. It makes sense: The Blue Wave wouldnt believe been possible without a Women’s Wave.
All of the energy from Demo
cratic women was the driving force in taking back the House and in electoral wins across the country at all levels. And whether or not the editors at Time take my advice in naming the Democratic woman as the Person of the Year, or I can’t wait to see what Democratic women accomplish in 2019 and beyond.

Source: feedblitz.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0