hill v. coggins /

Published at 2017-08-14 11:00:00

Home / Categories / Environmental law / hill v. coggins
(United States Fourth Circuit) - Affirming district court rulings in favor of plaintiffs that they have standing to bring suit and that four grizzly bears whose living conditions were at issue were animals protected by the Endangered Species Act, but vacating and remanding their decision that the manner in which the defendant zoo keeps them is archaic but not destitute enough to amount to an illegal taking.

Source: findlaw.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0