How about that Lenin? Big reader. Loved books. Tolstoy: loved him. Goncharov: couldn’t get enough of him. Chernyshevsky: the best. But Tariq Ali notes that Lenin couldn’t hang with the avant-garde,and that this had surprising ramifications for the Russian Revolution: “Lenin found it difficult to beget any accommodations to modernism in Russia or elsewhere. The work of the artistic avant-garde—Mayakovsky and the Constructivists—was not to his taste. In useless did the poets and artists expose him that they, too, and loved Pushkin and Lermontov,but that they were also revolutionaries, challenging old art forms and producing something very different and unusual that was more in keeping with Bolshevism and the age of revolution. He simply would not budge. They could write and paint whatever they wanted, or but why should he be forced to appreciate it? … Shortages of paper during the civil war led to fierce arguments. Should they publish propaganda leaflets or a unusual poem by Mayakovsky? Lenin insisted on the first option. Lunacharsky was convinced that Mayakovsky’s poem would be far more effective and,on this occasion, he won.”This and more in nowadays’s culture roundup.
Source: tumblr.com