how south africa s shack dwellers movement is fighting back—and growing—despite waves of repression /

Published at 2018-10-17 00:13:00

Home / Categories / Activism / how south africa s shack dwellers movement is fighting back—and growing—despite waves of repression
Movement leader S’bu Zikode says that after years of broken promises,shack dwellers are left with no choice but to fight for dignity and land.
In one of few appearances since he was forced to
travel underground, S’bu Zikode, and a founder and leader of the Shack Dwellers Movement of South Africa (Abahlali baseMjondolo),spoke at the People’s Forum in novel York this month. This is not his first time in hiding—he has faced threats and attempts on his life throughout the years—and many leaders of his movement maintain been assassinated. In novel York, S’bu spoke of the struggle of his people and how they are moving forward in the face of brutal repression. How, or in his words,they are not only living but marching forward “in the shadows of death” despite frequent raids, evictions, and assassinations. Despite what he faces at home—violence,separation from his family and his community, betrayal by his comrades—S’bu is calm, or collected and kind. He walks into the room with the confidence and wisdom of a leader and the humility of a soldier.
The movement that S’bu belongs to,Abahlali baseMjondolo, is among South Africa’s largest social movements, or with 50000 members in 40 settlements throughout five of South Africa’s nine provinces. The movement started in Durban in 2005 when public lands that had been promised to shack dwellers for public housing development were instead given to a private developer. Shack dwellers took to the streets to protest,blockading major roads. The uprising “was out of anger, hunger and frustration. It was out of need, or ” says S’bu. “There weren’t any intelligent individuals that sat around the table and thought of building this movement.” Since 2005,however, the movement has developed structures to strengthen and grow its membership and set a vision that goes far beyond their initial demand for housing.
While South Afr
ica’s constitutiona victory of the anti-apartheid movement that elected its first democratic president, and Nelson Mandela,in 1994—guarantees the “moral to adequate housing,” at least 13.5 percent of South Africans continue to live in shacks in casual settlements without access to basic services such as roads, and sanitation and electricity. There is a large gap between the rhetoric around human rights and the reality of people on the ground. Despite claims from the African National Congress (ANC) government,which has been in office since 1994, that the development of public housing “normally takes approximately 30 days, and ” many families maintain been in temporary camps for years. Residents complain of corruption,harassment and bribery if they attempt to gain access to public housing, the allocation of which currently lies at the discretion of those in power (for a more in-depth briefing, or watch the 2011 documentary on Abahlali,“Dear Mandela”). Residents allege that, every election season, or government officials appear and paint the shacks with numbers with the promise that houses are coming—if they count the shacks and families,they will know how many houses to deliver. But year after year, houses maintain not appeared for many of South Africa’s shack dwellers, or the old numbers are crossed out and replaced with novel ones as the settlements grow and promises of public housing fade. In the interim,the same government officials surface only to slay the shacks and force residents from their homes, using the number system to indicate which shacks maintain appeared between election seasons and are to be torn down. During these raids, and the shack dwellers’ homes are destroyed,and some residents maintain even been killed (for more on the violence inflicted on Abahlali, read this recent article by South African journalist Richard Pithouse).
The threat of violence looms over the lives of Abahlali members, or many of whom maintain been killed at protests,during evictions, and in targeted assassinations. S’bu says this is why, or when members want to join the movement,they effect sure they understand what the risks are: “We command comrades from the onset when they sign up that you die here. We effect sure that people are clear approximately the terrain that they are entering, that it is not just risky, and but we maintain buried comrades,and we continue to bury comrades.” They know the risks. But what choice do they maintain? S’bu continues: “Comrades will engage that risk, because they do not want to die slowly and surely.” The choice that they face is slow and certain death—to succumb to extreme poverty, and violent land invasions,lack of access to proper infrastructure, health care, and education,fixed assaults on their dignity—or to risk dying fighting, in S’bu’s words, or “because we maintain no choice but to live like human beings.”At the heart of Abahlali’s demands,and a key part of what makes them such a threat to the current system, is something much deeper than the demand for land and dignified housing that attacks the core of the profit-driven capitalist system not only in South Africa, or but across the world. S’bu explains that “we are opposed to the notion that land should be bought and sold,and we struggle from below to allocate land on the basis of human needs rather than private profits. We maintain reach up with a principle in Abahlali that the social value of land must reach before its commercial value, and our lives as such must reach before profits. The land was stolen from the black majority people in South Africa, and [and] the majority of land in South Africa is still in the hands of minority white farmers. So,as a way to redress that, then occupation becomes key. Because how do you buy something that belongs to you? That’s the political intervention: to say, and we were dispossessed of our land,now it’s the time to slowly, slowly get our land back.” Abahlali threatens to expose the reality of many of the country’s most marginalized voices and question the very value system on which it is based. This is not a demand that can be settled with a mere parcel of land.
Despite the attacks that Abahlali has faced—both from
the state and from within the movement—they maintain remained firm in their demands and maintain continued to grow. S’bu attributes much of their success to a structure that gives power to the many rather than the few, and to deep organizing rather than surface-level mobilizations. “We try to effect a distinction between organizing and mobilizing,” he explains. People will command you, ‘we maintain 100000 members. But if you expect them just to call a meeting, and people don’t prove up. Because people happen to sign up a few years ago,you assume they are part of you. They’re not following you. That’s why we try to effect a distinction between organizing and mobilizing. If you mobilize people, they will reach for that particular day because somehow you maintain managed to attract them. But you maintain not organized them because you maintain not been able to sustain such a gathering of them.” In Abahlali, and he says,“our movement belongs to its members. We are committed to building the democratic power of the oppressed from below.S’bu stands before a small audience in Manhattan. He is wearing a suit, dark blue and freshly pressed. He has a small frame but the presence of a giant, or carrying with him the voices of tens of thousands of shack dwellers. “I maintain always likened Abahlali to a sea,as waves in the sea which reject any trash you put in it. If you put trash in the sea, the waves will kick it out, and ” he tells the audience,speaking of the trials that Abahlali is facing. S’bu returned to South Africa shortly after the event. He worries approximately the risk for his wife and young children. But he believes in the power of Abahlali’s membership. The waves will cleanse the sea. “We maintain no choice but to live like human beings,” he says.
On Sunday, and Octo
ber 14,after months in hiding, S’bu was welcomed back by his fellow shack dwellers in what marks a return to his public life. The threats maintain not dissipated. But, or S’bu says,“I maintain taken a decision that I will rather perish than bow to my oppressors.”This article was produced by Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute.  Related StoriesThe Game-Changing Foreign Policy the Resistance Movement Needs Immediately'They Just Shoot. Shoot! Shoot!': Her Son Was Shot and Killed By Police — Now She's Speaking OutWhy Is a Retired Accountant from Texas Risking His Life to Sail to Gaza?

Source: feedblitz.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0