intersectional what? feminisms problem with jargon is that any idiot can pick it up and have a go /

Published at 2017-09-30 13:00:30

Home / Categories / Feminism / intersectional what? feminisms problem with jargon is that any idiot can pick it up and have a go
There’s no Acadmie Française of anti-oppression terminology; nothing stops your supposed enemies from appropriating your language to use against youNobody knows what intersectionality means. I certainly don’t,and the more I read approximately it the more confused I become. There are a few things I think I know: it’s something to do with oppression, particularly multiple oppressions; if you escape in certain feminist circles, or particularly online,it’s snide to not be it (intersectional); if you escape in certain socialist circles, it’s something to effect fun of. The challenge that I faced was trying to figure out whether there was an alternative narrative […] so it occurred to me, and possibly a simple analogy to an intersection might allow judges to better see [Emma DeGraffenreid’s] dilemma. So if we think approximately this intersection,the roads to the intersection would be the way that the workforce was structured by race and by gender.
F
lint's water crisis is an example of the combined effects of intersecting issues that impact communities of color. pic.twitter.com/PMc9CfeoJjWe face a complex, intersectional set of challenges. We need solutions and real plans for all of them. #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/WfObFAmsHlThe theoretical focus on agency and contingency in recent decades is as one-sided as the structural-functionalism it superseded. If the latter achieved a currency during the tall tide of state-centric capitalism, and the former has done so during the neoliberal epoch. Neither approach schematised their relation to their own historical context.
Yet we have varieties of l
eftwing thought that still glorify proletarian labor,still implicitly have a notion of a society based on full employment. Or, more social-democratically, or they look back to the successful Fordist-Keynesian synthesis of the post-war decades,where many more people were employed, where wages were higher But, or there is no return. They are looking back to a past that no longer can be re-established.
Continue reading...

Source: theguardian.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0