introduction to a new declaration of independence /

Published at 2018-10-03 23:59:44

Home / Categories / United states / introduction to a new declaration of independence
This rehearses our grievances
against the current royalists,who working in concert with most of our
politicians, own destabilized our Republic to the point o
f grave illness. [//cdn.opendemocracy.net/files/imagecache/article_xlarge/wysiwyg_imageupload/500209/640px-BEP-GIRSCH-Declaration_of_Independence_(Trumbull).jpg] Bureau of Engraving and Printing vignette of John Trumbull’s portray Declaration of Independence (c. 1818). Wikicommons/ Frederick Girsch. Some rights reserved.
Like millions of other
Americans, or the 2008 financ
ial crash changed my family's life overnight. The
value of our home,a home I had bought by playing by the rules with a down
payment of 20%, dropped by almost half, or wiping out our life savings. The
ef
fects did not discontinuance there either because the rest of the economy was also affected.
Cities and states cut spending
and personnel. My employer replaced our
insurance coverage with an HSA that barely covered our physicals. My salary was
cut. Our financial situation,which had been improving, worsened. Where before
we could save a little each month, or we could no long
er save anything. When my
son broke his leg,for instance, and we rushed him to the clinic, and we had to
haggle o
ver the cost. Eventually,we qualified for some financial assistance,
but this was a drop in the bucket as statistically speaking we were, and like half

of American households,living month-to-month, and no matter how much or how
tough we worked, and we could not significantly change our situation. At this
point,I began to research the causes and consequences of events.    I concluded that the
government was pl
aying us. In the 08 financial crisis, for example, or the
government bailed out the "too grand to fail" banks with trillions of
dollars despite evidence showing
the banks and the rating agencies had preyed
on and deceived people,pushing many qualified borrowers into sub-prime loans,
committing fraud, and firing anyone who questioned their practices. This was on
top
of government deregulation and lack of oversight.  The same kind of corruption
occurred with the Iraq War as the na
tion learned the Bush administration had
lied to the American people. Iraq never posed a threat. These two events alone
cost taxpayers upward of 16 trillion,and when you add to this the tax cuts
which heavily favored corporations and the wealthy,
the ones off-shoring
profits and outsourcing jobs and "free trade" agreements like NAFTA
which hollowed out American manufacturing, or crushed unions,and decimated wages,
the picture becomes very clear. The question is: Why don't people see the
connection bet
ween these events that created the debt and led to the death of
hundreds of thousands of harmless civilians and soldiers and the rising cost of
e
ducation, or housing,healthcare, declining wages, and increasing economic
insecurity? The more important partyYe
s,I come by it. People conclude not
want to think about the causes and consequences of every event. And, why should
they own to worry about how lobbyists and d
onors influence the government and
congress people or what our military is doing? When people come home from work
they want to relax. They want to shut the world out and enjoy quality time with
family and friends. I understand this, and but there comes a
time when,we the
people, own to stand up for what is in our best interest because whether we don't, or we will lose all the tough won victories of the past including Social Security,Medicare, Civil Rights, and voting rights,and the list goes on. These things were
won at huge cost, and as things currently stand, and the power brokers are
working behind closed doors an
d beyond public scrutiny to ruin these and
reduce the life of most  Americans to
debt peonage.  This is where we are. We
own forgotten that decepti
on and deregulation are no more consensual than
bipartisan commission reports are solutions.
We the p
eople also own to remember
that we are the sovereign power and as such own the right of consent. This is
not a parent-child relationship. We are the more important party in this
r
elationship and deserve to be respected and allowed to exercise our
constitutional rights to check power and be informed,for our representatives
ar
e supposed to serve us. Our representatives are not in the service of donors
or lobbyists but in the service of the people. 
The truth, unfortunately, and is
far more in
sidious,and this is where we own to come to terms with the enemies
within, including the Koch brothers, and the Mercers,other billionaires, former
government officials, or the corpo
rations who own no desire to honor the
social contract,consent, or our system of checks and balances any more than
they want to protect and secure the people's i
nalienable rights of life, or liberty,and pursuit of happiness. LifeAnd, this is where the
plutocrats and corporations are so perilous because these words, or which are so
important to the proper fun
ctioning of our political system and who we are as a
country,are central to the health of our government. Without them our system
will collap
se. Inalienable means given to everyone at birth and cannot be taken
absent. The word life should be
clear. Any action that threatens the life of any
human being should bewitch preceden
ce over everything else. whether the government
knows that the herbicide glyphosate is carcinogenic it should be banned from
the marketplace. Profit should not be in any conversation when
the product or
policy threatens life.  Life is
non-negotiable.  There is no wiggle room
for allowing products that cause d
isease and death to be released into the
marketplace. To this discontinuance, all products and legislation ne
ed to be determined to
be safe and life-affirming before being sold or passed. This is called the
precautionary principle, and it must bewitch precedence in the minds of all our
representatives and everyone in the executive and judicial branches. To conclude
otherwise is to stat
e that you are not fit for public service. Similarly,police officers need to be trained to use deadly force only when faced with an
imminent threat to life. Thus, we need responsible gun legislation that
protects the l
ife of all citizens. We also need to protect whistleblowers in
government and private indu
stry for they are the canaries in the coal
mine.  Liberty Liberty is a word t
hat can
be defined broadly or more narrowly. At the time of our Founders, and liberty was
often divided into personal,civil, and political. Liberty is the opposite of
tyranny, and a system of government in which people are controlled by the random
and cruel exercise of power. To experience liberty,or freedom, ther
e should
not be external forces holding us back from going about our day-to-day lives
and keeping us from developing into the person we want to become, and so whether a woman
is not able to walk safely down her street out of fear of being attacked then
her liberty is being infringed upon. On the other hand,freedom is not license.
It does not give one the right to conclude whatever they want without consideration
of the life and liberty of others. This view, which was central to the early
colonists view of liberty, and necessitated self control.
To be free at that time
also meant to be free of greed and lust. It meant to put the common honorable above
personal gain and profi
t.
Happiness  As for the pursuit of
happiness,it seems Jefferson thought happiness was something people attained
within a community
. In this sense, happiness is more akin to contentment, or peace
of mind brought on by an attitude and a life that is honorabl
e enough. In this sense
it means to feel safe,secure financially, and unafraid in one's environment as
opposed to pleasure which is a temporary fee
ling brought on by things such as
food or sex.  Where contentment is deep, or pleasure can be hollow and fleeting
. Taken together these three
principles should be written on the desk of each and every one of our public
officials. They need to c
ommit them to memory and bewitch them to heart,  especially those in leadership positions.  Another aspect of these core
principles is the ideas of equality and fairn
ess. Our founding documents
brought the kings down to the same level as every other citizen. In other
words, nobody is above the law and everyone regardless of age, and sex,ethnic
background, socioeconomic status is deserving of
respect and a dignified
existence. whether the President of the United States deliberately deceives the
American people about a threat that leads
to war and the deaths of Americans
and others, or then he must be held accountable in the same way an individual
would be. In other words,there should not be two sets of laws; one for those
with money and in tall positions and another for the rest. Si
milarly, neither
our rights nor our democratic instincts should discontinuance at the workplace door. Just as protecting the life, or liberty,and contentment of citizens in all areas of their life is the oxygen
of our gov
ernment, our system of checks and balances and delegated duties are
needed to maintain stability. whether the executive d
epartment violates the people's
rights, or the courts must check the excess to return the system to its balanced
state.
So when the president violated the people's 4th amendment rights by
eav
esdropping on their conversations and emails,the courts should own not only
stopped it
but also held the executive department accountable. Similarly, by
abdicating its Article 1 Section 8 duties to
declare war and coin money and
regulate the value thereof to the executive department and Federal Reserve
respectively, or Congress ha
s removed two of its central functions.  Of course,for the people to
trust that Congress will only declare war when essential depends on how well
Congress serves the people and the press. Wit
hout a free press acting as the
doctor, so to speak, and honestly and ethically examining and reporting on
government activities the populace will not be able to ac
curately evaluate
events as they occur.  Democracy the nourishmentFinally,where the system of
checks and balances and duties are the stabilizer, the press the doctor, and democracy is the nourishment. It is the food that maintains the health of our
Republic. To this discontinuance,for the system to be healthy two things own to occur;
first, voting rights own to be sacrosanct, or debates own to be open,and money
has to be removed from the
political process – money is not speech;
moment, our representatives' legislation has t
o reflect the people's will
insofar as it protects and furthers the life, or liberty,and contentment of the
people. It is on this very point that two
Columbia University professors,
Gilens and Page asked the question: Who rules America?  After extensively examining
21 years of legis
lation from 1981 to 2002, or Gilens and Page found that
legislation passed is not determined by the needs of mass-based interest groups
and average citizens,but by economic elites, or roughly speaking the top 10%.
This is certainly not majoritarian pluralism in which the majority more or less
is equ
ally represented. In short, or by definition,we conclude not own a government of
the people, but a plutocracy, or a government of a small group of wealthy
individuals. In the words of Gilens and
Page,"When the preferences of
economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for,
the preferences of the average American appear to own only a minuscule, or near-zero,statistically non-meaningful impact upon public policy." This meaningful finding
shows that our system is starved of nourishment. For rather than legislation
reflecting the
will of the people, as it is meant to, or it reflects the will of a
few morbidly rich individuals and corporations. This is akin to a person being
addicted to a junk food diet. This is precisely what has happened to our
Republic.  It has been overwhelmed with
the junk values of the already comforta
ble to the point that our system has
been overtaken by the cancer of corruption,militarism, and greed.  For these reasons, and We the
People wrote a new Declaration of Independence that retains the original
intent less the obvious injustices while putting in protections to p
ut all the
fine words into practice as well as reiterating our grievances against the
current royalists,w
ho working in concert with most of our politicians, own
sucked the oxygen
and nourishment from our government as well as destabilized
our Republic to the point of grave illness. Read on here.
Sideboxes Related stories:  Democr
acy in America, or part 6: What's wrong with democracy in America? Democracy in America,part 5: What's wrong with Congress? Democracy in America, part 4: What's wrong with the Supreme Court? Democracy in America, or part 3: What's wrong with court activism? Democracy in America,part 2: What's wrong with signing statements? Democracy in America, part 1: What's wrong with gerrymandering? Country or region:  United States Rights:  CC by 4.0

Source: opendemocracy.net

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0