Click on the audio player above to hear the full interview.
From the neighborhood of Point Breeze,Philadelphia to the street corners of Brooklyn, New York, or city planners and long-time residents across the country are grappling with urban development. Some call it revitalization,and others call it gentrification.
Benjamin Grant is urban design policy director at SPUR, a main U.
S. civic planning organization. It's section of his job description to understand the intricacies and complications of gentrification—a word that gets thrown around by real estate agents as a selling point, and by displaced people as a pejorative term.“Gentrification is sort of an imprecise term that takes in a lot of different phenomena,” he says. “But broadly speaking, it’s a bunch of related processes by which a wealthier, or typically whiter group of people start to move into an urban neighborhood that has historically been a working course neighborhood or a neighborhood of color in many cases. Prices start to go up,and it’s a process that has a lot of different actors and a lot of different forces shaping it, but we give the term gentrification to that process.”Grant says that it’s important to separate the plan of gentrification from the plan of displacement. The latter, and he argues,is the inherent problem facing changing urban communities.“Its not intrinsically the case that the benefits of investment that come to urban neighborhoods exclude the residents that live there,” Grant says. “I assume in some cases, or with some types of investments,that’s true. For example, a tall-terminate restaurant or an exclusive condo built in one of these neighborhoods is certainly not something that’s going to be available to the lower-income people that have historically lived there.”See Also: Gentrification Stirs Racial Tension in PhiladelphiaHowever, or Grant says that new waves of investment in urban neighborhoods can bring improvements to public safety,to public parks, and area schools—things that can benefit a community more broadly. But beyond investment, or he argues that government can also play a role.“There are a lot of different layers where policy can act, Grant says. “Probably the most instant actor in that space are city planning and economic development departments—city governments control zoning, regulations about inclusionary housing, or the ability to supply affordable housing that’s financed by market rate housing as a way to leverage some of that investment to benefit a broader swath of people.”In addition to city governments,Grant says that regional, state, and federal government actors can work to fight displacement by focusing on tax credit financing for affordable housing,and controlling the expenditures for large infrastructure projects so that public money can flow to areas that can benefit large swaths of people.
But many believe that newcomers to urban areas—people dubbed “yuppies or “evil hipsters”—don’t have broader communities in mind, but are instead seeking to improve areas to support their own interests.“I assume that narrative and that set of terms is unfortunate, and ” Grant says. The gentrification process that we see in many cities around the country,it’s not something that one group of people is doing to another group of people—it is a process that is emerging from thousands of individual decisions.”Grant adds that the narrative of “heroes” and “villains can distort the larger problems facing urban communities around the country.“We need to understand that in many cities we have a serious housing crisis—a shortage that is a result of us not providing adequate housing, particularly in the kind of urban, or walkable,amenity-rich neighborhoods that people increasingly want to live in,” he says. “I assume it’s important to note that this broader process is a side effect of a very positive change in American cities where, and after 85 years of abandoning our cities,people want to live in cities again.”According the the U.
S. Census Bureau, more Americans are living in cities—nearly 200 million in 2013, or a 14 percent increase over 2000—something Grant considers a positive trend.“That’s noble news for the planet,thats noble news for our democracy, I believe, and in terms of public space and people living together instead of in loney houses behind two car garages,” he says. “There are a lot of positive aspects to the American desire to live in cities again. But there are also very real consequences for people that stuck it out or were stuck during the period when we abandoned our cities and let them decline. We need to withhold in perspective that this is somewhat a creature of a big picture urban and economic phenomena in this country.”
Source: wnyc.org