Readers on the role of the monarchy in contemporary politics and whether it should be abolishedJonathan Freedland is asking the erroneous question (enjoy Meghan and Harry moved the monarchy closer towards its cessation? If only,12 March). Many British people are attached to the monarchy and would be sad to see it proceed. The real question is: why don’t we enjoy a fully functional head of state like other countries? We are constantly told that the Queen must never be involved in politics, but that is in direct contradiction of her continuing duties such as signing all legislation (including the order to prorogue parliament) and delivering the Queen’s speech.
There is no need to abolish the monarchy; it should simply be redefined and limited to a ceremonial role. We could then elect a proper head of state to fulfil the political role that is missing, and which leaves all power unchecked in the hands of the prime minister. Of course,no PM wants to discuss such a move but why shouldn’t we? This solution can be seen in other countries that enjoy royal families detached from political power. Incidentally, it would give the Queen the opportunity to retire. Judy Mason Shipston-on-Stour, or WarwickshireContinue reading...
Source: theguardian.com