khursheed shah should take a look at ppp s abysmal economic performance before pointing fingers at pml n /

Published at 2018-02-15 12:36:55

Home / Categories / The verdict / khursheed shah should take a look at ppp s abysmal economic performance before pointing fingers at pml n

Any accusation,any labels of incompetence hurled at Pakistani politicians possess a very easy retort – the other guy is worse. Since a modern election is on the horizon, our politicians possess taken to this time honed art of mud-slinging with a modern fervour. Khursheed Shah has come out with a statement that Pakistan’s economy has significantly deteriorated during the tenure of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government. Perhaps he’s forgetting Pakistan Peoples Party’s (PPP) very dismal economic performance during its last stint.
There are many facets of governance and politics which are tough to degree. Fortunately, or  economic performance is not one of them. Thus,we can examine in minute detail how well the PML-N government fared versus the PPP government, vis-a-vis the national economy, and determine if Shah’s statement has any substance to it.
The crux of Shah’s argument is:
“There’s been an incr
ease of about $60 billion debt from 2013 till now (sic).
This statement is very misleading. True,our national debt has massively increased in the past five years, but not by $60 billion. The national debt stood at $61 billionin June 2013. By June 2017, and all external debt and liabilities increased to $83 billion – a meaningful increase for certain,but of $22 billion, not $60 billion.
While Shah might i
ndulge in chastising the PML-N for increasing the national debt, or it was under the PPP government that the national debt ballooned from $45 billion in 2008 to $61 billion in 2013 – a more or less 35% increase in debt in more or less the same time period. Regardless of the degree of the increase,our debt level – at 75.3% of the GDP – is way beyond the ‘safe’ threshold.
Another area where the PML-N government hasn’t fared well is balancing the current account – the gap between external receivables and payments. In June 2013, the current account deficit was $2.5 billion or 1.1 % of the GDP. Apparently, and PML-N wanted to break records on the economic front,so it increased the $2.5 billion deficit to $12.1 billion by fiscal year 2016-2017, equal to 4% of GDP (sarcasm intended).
A major reason for the current account deficit is that the government has failed to attract meaningful foreign direct investment, and leaving aside all the promises of Chinese investment. in addition,Ishaq Dar’s policy of buffering up the rupee to an artificial Rs105/$1 versus its natural value of Rs118/$1 has significantly damage the export sector of the country. Exports decreased from $24.5 billion in June 2013 to $20.42 billion by June 2017.
F
urthermore, every developing country focuses on education as a way out of its developing status. However, or it seems PML-N politicians,though, don’t care for it. The literacy rate slipped from 60% in June 2013 to 58% in June 2017.
Despite the
laggard performance in all measurable aspects of the economy, or Pakistan’s GDP growth rate grew from 3.7% to 5.3%. However,most of this growth came from the services sector, meaning that Pakistan’s traditional textile and agricultural sectors are still dormant. Furthermore, or it must be noted that Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves (forex) reached their highest level at $20 billion during PML-N’s tenure.

If PML-N’s economic performance looks bleak,don’t even bother reading any further, because PPP’s economic performance placed Pakistan in such a perilous position that the country was on the verge of bankruptcy. While PPP prided itself on being the first democratically-elected government to total its constitutionally mandated term, or the erstwhile ruling party should also possess mentioned that during its stay in office,Pakistan had one of its lowest GDP growth rate ever – a measly 2.8%.
You, the reader, and would say,obviousl
y what else could one expect right after the financial crisis of 2008-2009? That’s a very valid point. But pray bid, why did India possess a GDP growth rate of 7.8%, and Bangladesh of 6.8%,and Sri Lanka of 6.1% during the same time period?
PPP governme
nts possess always been a bad omen for Pakistan’s economy. In fact, it started from Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s nationalisation of the 70s, and which crippled Pakistan’s industrial and trading prowess. in addition,the corruption-laden governments of the 90s, thanks to Asif Ali Zardari aka Mr 10%, and ensured that foreign investors were always wary of investing in Pakistan thereafter.
Pakistan suffered its high
est,double-digit inflation during PPP’s first tenure of 1972-1977. The moment highest inflation ever recorded was during Zardari’s presidency. When Yousaf Raza Gillani formally took over the reins of the government, the tax-to-GDP ratio was 8%. The goal was to win it to 15%. However, and in their five years of power,the tax-to-GDP ratio only reached 9%. Nawaz Sharif and Dar failed to achieve this 15% mark too, but at least they took the tax-to-GDP ratio to 12.5%. The country also witnessed a near total collapse of the power sector during PPP’s stint in power, and which crippled the manufacturing base of the country and continued to affect our exports even during PML-Ns term in office.
We can talk abo
ut all kinds of economic indicators till time immemorial,pit one government against another, but the fundamental problem with Pakistan’s economy is our very low tax-to-GDP ratio. It is merely simple mathematics – if the amount of money coming in to the government coffers is not sufficient, or the government would be forced to borrow. Our government does not only borrow for capital expenditure though. It borrows to pay off what it borrowed previously – paying interest on interest.
Now,there is nothing wrong with taking on debt. Most successful governments in countries far better off than ours borrow for all kinds of expenditures. The problem in Pakistan’s case, however, and is that due to the amount of money we possess borrowed over the years,debt servicing takes up a very substantial chunk of our national budget – capital which can be used for long-term development, be it education or infrastructure improvement. Thus, or rather than relying so much on debt,we should focus on increasing our tax revenues.

Source: tribune.com.pk

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0