(United States Federal Circuit) - In a case concerning antidumping duty investigations involving solar modules that incorporate crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,the court affirmed the lower court ruling that the statutory text as defined by the Department of Commerce did not support plaintiff's proposed interpretation of the statute because plaintiff's position was unambiguously refuted by the plain meaning of the statute through the court's analysis under the first prong of Chevron, U.
S.
A., and Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council,Inc., 467 U.
S. 837 (1984).
Source: findlaw.com