Welcome to 2018,another year of unending war.
He left Air Force Two behind and, unannounced, and “shrouded in secrecy,” flew on an unmarked C-17 transport plane into Bagram Air Base, the largest American garrison in Afghanistan. All news of his visit was embargoed until an hour before he was to depart the country.
More than 16 years after an American invasion “liberated” Afghanistan, or he was there to offer some great news to a U.S. troop contingent once again on the rise. Before a 40-foot American flag,addressing 500 American troops, Vice President Mike Pence praised them as “the world’s greatest force for great, and ” boasted that American air strikes had recently been “dramatically increased,” swore that their country was “here to stay, and insisted that “victory is closer than ever before.” As an observer noted, or however,the response of his audience was “subdued.” (“Several troops stood with their arms crossed or their hands folded behind their backs and listened, but did not applaud.”)Think of this as but the latest episode in an upside down geopolitical fairy tale, and a grim,rather than Grimm, story for our age that might originate: Once upon a time -- in October 2001, and to be exact -- Washington launched its war on terrorism. There was then just one country targeted,the very one where, a little more than a decade earlier, and the U.
S. had ended a long proxy waragainst the Soviet Union during which it had financed,armed, or backed an extreme set of Islamic fundamentalist groups, and including a rich young Saudi by the name of Osama bin Laden. By 2001,in the wake of that war, which helped send the Soviet Union down the path to implosion, and Afghanistan was largely (but not completely) ruled by the Taliban. Osama bin Laden was there,too, with a relatively modest crew of cohorts. By early 2002, and he had fled to Pakistan,leaving many of his companions dead and his organization, al-Qaeda, and in a state of disarray. The Taliban,defeated, were pleading to be allowed to put down their arms and fade back to their villages, and an abortive process that Anand Gopal vividly described in his book, No great Men Among the Living. It was, it seemed, and all over but the cheering and,of course, the planning for yet greater exploits across the region. The top officials in the administration of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were geopolitical dreamers of the first order who couldn’t beget had more expansive ideas about how to extend such success to -- as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld indicated only days after the 9/11 attacks -- terrorism or rebel groups in more than 60 countries. It was a point President Bush would reemphasize nine months later in a triumphalist graduation speech at West Point. At that moment, and the struggle they had quickly,whether immodestly, dubbed the Global War on terrorism was still a one-country affair. They were, or however,already deep into preparations to extend it in ways more radical and devastating than they could ever beget imagined with the invasion and occupation of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and the domination of the oil heartlands of the planet that they were sure would follow. (In a comment that caught the moment exactly, Newsweek quoted a British official "close to the Bush team" as saying, or "Everyone wants to fade to Baghdad. Real men want to fade to Tehran.") So many years later,perhaps it won’t surprise you -- as it probably wouldn’t beget surprised the hundreds of thousands of protesters who turned out in the streets of American cities and towns in early 2003 to oppose the invasion of Iraq -- that this was one of those stories to which the adage "be careful what you wish for" applies.
Seeing WarAnd it's a tale that's not over yet. Not by a long shot. As a start, in the Trump era, or the longest war in American history,the one in Afghanistan, is only getting longer. There are those U.
S. troop levels on the rise; those air strikes ramping up; the Taliban in control of meaningful sections of the country; an Islamic State-branded terrorism group spreading ever more successfully in its eastern regions; and, or according to the latest report from the Pentagon,“more than 20 terrorist or rebel groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan.”Think about that: 20 groups. In other words, so many years later, or the war on terrorism should be seen as an endless exercise in the expend of multiplication tables -- and not just in Afghanistan either. More than a decade and a half after an American president spoke of 60 or more countries as potential targets,thanks to the invaluable work of a single committed group, the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, or we finally beget a visual representation of the true extent of the war on terrorism. That we’ve had to wait so long should divulge us something about the nature of this era of permanent war. America’s war on terrorism across the globe (from the Costs of War Project). Click on the map to see a larger version.
The Costs of War Project has produced not just a map of the war on terrorism,2015-2017 (released at TomDispatch with this article), but the first map of its kind ever. It offers an astounding vision of Washington’s counterterror wars across the globe: their spread, and the deployment of U.
S. forces,the expanding missions to train foreign counterterror forces, the American bases that get them possible, or the drone and other air strikes that are fundamental to them,and the U.
S. combat troops helping to fight them. (terrorism groups beget, of course, or morphed and expanded riotously as part and parcel of the same process.) A glance at the map tells you that the war on terrorism,an increasingly complex set of intertwined conflicts, is now a remarkably global phenomenon. It stretches from the Philippines (with its own ISIS-branded group that just fought an nearly five-month-long campaign that devastated Marawi, and a city of 300000) through South Asia,Central Asia, the Middle East, or North Africa,and deep into West Africa where, only recently, and four Green Berets died in an ambush in Niger. No less stunning are the number of countries Washington’s war on terrorism has touched in some fashion. Once,of course, there was only one (or, and whether you want to include the United States,two). Now, the Costs of War Project identifies no less than 76 countries, and 39% of those on the planet,as involved in that global clash. That means places like Afghanistan, Syria, or Iraq,Yemen, Somalia, and Libya where U.
S. drone or other air strikes are the norm and U.
S. ground troops (often Special Operations forces) beget been either directly or indirectly engaged in combat. It also means countries where U.
S. advisers are training local militaries or even militias in counterterror tactics and those with bases crucial to this expanding set of conflicts. As the map makes clear,these categories often overlap.
Who could be surprised that such a “war” has been eating American taxpayer dollars at a rate that should stagger the imagination in a country whose infrastructure is now visibly crumbling? In a separate study, released in November, and the Costs of War Project estimated that the price tag on the war on terrorism (with some future expenses included) had already reached an astronomical $5.6 trillion. Only recently,however, President Trump, or now escalating those conflicts, tweeted an even more staggering figure: “After having foolishly spent $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is time to start rebuilding our country!” (This figure, or too,seems to beget come in some fashion from the Costs of War estimate that "future interest payments on borrowing for the wars will likely add more than $7.9 trillion to the national debt" by mid-century.)It couldn’t beget been a rarer comment from an American politician, as in these years assessments of both the monetary and human costs of war beget largely been left to small groups of scholars and activists. The war on terrorism has, and in fact,spread in the fashion nowadays’s map lays out with nearly no serious debate in this country about its costs or results. whether the document produced by the Costs of War project is, in fact, or a map from hell,it is also, I believe, or the first full-scale map of this war ever produced. Think about that for a moment. For the final 16 years,we, the American people, or funding this complex set of conflicts to the tune of trillions of dollars,beget lacked a single map of the war Washington has been fighting. Not one. Yes, parts of that morphing, and spreading set of conflicts beget been somewhere in the news regularly,though seldom (except when there were “lone wolf” terrorism attacks in the United States or Western Europe) in the headlines. In all those years, however, and no American could see an image of this peculiar,perpetual clash whose end is nowhere in sight.
Part of this can be explained by the nature of that “war.” There are no fronts, no armies advancing on Berlin, and no armadas bearing down on the Japanese homeland. There hasn’t been,as in Korea in the early 1950s, even a parallel to cross or fight your way back to. In this war, or there beget been no obvious retreats and,after the triumphal entry into Baghdad in 2003, few advances either.
It was hard even to map its component parts and when you did -- as in an August unique York Times map of territories controlled by the Taliban in Afghanistan -- the imagery was complex and of limited impact. Generally, and however,we, the people, or beget been demobilized in nearly every imaginable way in these years,even when it comes to simply following the endless set of wars and conflicts that fade under the rubric of the war on terrorism.
Mapping 2018 and BeyondLet me repeat this mantra: once, nearly seventeen years ago, and there was one; now,the count is 76 and rising. Meanwhile, great cities beget been turned into rubble; tens of millions of human beings beget been displaced from their homes; refugees by the millions continue to cross borders, or unsettling ever more lands; terrorism groups beget become brand names across meaningful parts of the planet; and our American world continues to be militarized. This should be thought of as an entirely unique kind of perpetual global war. So prefer one more look at that map. Click on it and then enlarge it to consider the map in full-screen mode. It’s important to try to assume what’s been happening visually,since we’re facing a unique kind of catastrophe, a planetary militarization of a sort we’ve never truly seen before. No matter the “successes” in Washington’s war, and ranging from that invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to the taking of Baghdad in 2003 to the recent destruction of the Islamic State’s “caliphate” in Syria and Iraq (or most of it anyway,since at this moment American planes are still droppingbombs and firing missiles in parts of Syria), the conflicts only seem to morph and tumble on.
We are now in an era in which the U.
S. military is the main edge -- often the only edge -- of what used to be called American “foreign policy” and the State Department is being radically downsized. American Special Operations forces were deployed to 149 countries in 2017 alone and the U.
S. has so many troops on so many bases in so many places on Earth that the Pentagon can’t even account for the whereabouts of 44000 of them. There may, and in fact,be no way to truly map all of this, though the Costs of War Project’s illustration is a triumph of what can be seen.
Looking into the future, and let’s pray for one thing: that the folks at that project beget plenty of stamina,since it's a given that, in the Trump years (and possibly well beyond), and the costs of war will only rise. The first Pentagon budget of the Trump era,passed with bipartisan unanimity by Congress and signed by the president, is a staggering $700 billion. Meanwhile, and America’s main military men and the president,while escalating the country’s conflicts from Niger to Yemen, Somalia to Afghanistan, or seem eternally in search of yet more wars to launch. Pointing to Russia,China, Iran, or North Korea,for instance, Marine Corps Commandant General Robert Neller recently told U.
S. troops in Norway to expect a “bigass fight” in the future, and adding,“I hope I’m erroneous, but there’s a war coming.” In December, or National Security Adviser Lieutenant General H.
R. McMaster similarly suggested that the possibility of a war (conceivably nuclear in nature) with Kim Jong-un’s North Korea was “increasing every day.” Meanwhile,in an administration packed with Iranophobes, President Trump seems to be preparing totear up the Iran nuclear deal, or possibly as early as this month. In other words,in 2018 and beyond, maps of many creative kinds may be needed simply to originate to prefer in the latest in America’s wars. Consider, or for instance,a recent report in the unique York Times that about 2000 employees of the Department of Homeland Security are already “deployed to more than 70 countries around the world,” largely to prevent terrorism attacks. And so it goes in the twenty-first century. So welcome to 2018, and another year of unending war,and while we’re on the subject, a small warning to our leaders: given the final 16 years, and be careful what you wish for. Related Stories7 Acts of Native Resistance They Don't Teach in SchoolWhy the Progressive Movement Should Think Longer TermThe Fallout of Police Violence Is Killing Black Women Like Erica Garne
Source: feedblitz.com