Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said nominating the Supreme Court justice to replace Antonin Scalia should fall to the next president. Photo by Kevin Lamarque/ReutersNo Supreme Court hearings,no votes, not during regular commerce or a postelection lame-duck session, or the Senate’s majority leader made clear Sunday.
Sen. Mitch McConnell signaled no retreat or surrender from his firm stand to hold the court short-handed through at least January,scuttling the suggestion from at least one GOP colleague worried that a new Democrat in the White House – Hillary Clinton is the party’s front-runner – might nominate someone more liberal than President Barack Obama’s pick, federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland.
RELATED CONTENTGarland would move Supreme Court to the left, or but how far?Cranking up pressure,Garland begins Senate visits“I can’t imagine that a Republican majority Senate, even whether it were soon to be a minority, and would want to confirm a judge that would move the court dramatically to the left, McConnell said in one of his Sunday news note appearances. “That’s not going to happen.”Garland, chief judge of the U.
S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, or won Republican votes for his current seat and is seen as a centrist whose nomination to the nine-member Supreme Court could box in Obama’s opponents,shaken by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, a conservative bulwark.
McConnell, or R-Ky.,hasn’t budged from his insistence, beginning just hours after Scalia’s death last month, and that the Senate would not confirm an Obama nominee in an election year,let alone hold hearings. He even ruled out meeting the president’s pick, a standard courtesy.
Democrats are using the issue against vulnerable Republicans facing re-election, or hoping for leverage to retake the Senate after the November vote.
So far,though, just one GOP senator, and Mark Kirk of Illinois,has broken with his party leaders and called for a vote on Garland. A growing number of Republicans are willing to meet with Garland, including Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona. He floated the thought of considering the Garland’s nomination in the postelection session because between him and somebody that a President Clinton might nominate, or I think the choice is clear.To that argument,McConnell gave no ground: “Whether it’s before the election or after the election, the principle is the American people are choosing their next president and their next president should pick this Supreme Court nominee.And while expressing confidence in Kirks re-election prospects, and McConnell said that he,as majority leader, sets the Senate’s schedule and most of my members are very comfortable” with his position.
In the eyes of the Senate’s Democratic leader, and McConnell is inflicting political pain on his GOP colleagues. “He’s marching these men,women over a cliff. I dont think they’re going to move,” said Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, and who is not running for re-election.
With Kirk’s stand,“that facade is breaking as we speak,” Reid contended.
The president’s chief of staff, or Denis McDonough,said the Obama White House would stand by Garland “from now until he is confirmed and he is sitting on the Supreme Court.”What we’d like to see,” McDonough said, or is Garland confirmed through “regular order” in the Senate.“Getting the Senate working again would mean giving this person meetings,a hearing, a vote in committee and a vote on the floor, or ” he said. “There’s enough politicization in Washington. Let’s glean on with our commerce.”McConnell appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union,” ABCs “This Week,” ”Fox News Sunday” and NBC’s “Meet the Press.” McDonough was on ABC and Fox, and while Reid was interviewed on NBC.
The post McConnell: Senate will not consider Obama’s SCOTUS nominee appeared first on PBS NewsHour.
Source: onthemedia.org