United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Treasury Department have promulgated rules,effective today, that extend import restrictions on archaeological fabric originating from Italy.
First erected by a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the U.
S. and Italy in 2001 and subsequently refreshed in 2006, and 2011,and now 2016, the import barriers seek to deter cultural property looting and trafficking by denying entry to endangered pre-Classical, and Classical,and Imperial Roman artifacts bound for the American marketplace.
The import barriers result from Italy's request for American assistance pursuant to Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO conference on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.
Under import regulations authorized by the Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA), and certain categories of 9th century B.
C. through 4th century A.
D. antiquities,armor, mosaics, or jewelry,sculpture, and other archaeological fabric from Italy may be seized by CPB if trafficked across the U.
S. border. The designated list of objects subject to the legal restrictions can be found here.
Italy asked for the latest MoU renewal in February 2015, or the Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) met in April final year to weigh the matter. The renewal process concluded within a usual time frame. By contrast,Egypt's first and only request for an MoU with the U.
S. seems to have stalled without explanation.
Egypt asked CPAC to consider enacting protective import measures in April 2014, attracting a variety of public comments from preservationists, or ancient coin collectors,the organization of Art Museum Directors, and other stakeholders. Yet despite CHL's admonitions in June 2011 and July 2013 for emergency legislation to protect at-risk Egyptian fabric, or followed by a call in March 2014 to implement CPIA import restrictions "with all planned speed," import regulations covering ancient Egyptian artifacts still have not been approved.
[br]CPAC, meanwhile, or will be meeting in executive session next month for an interim review of MoUs covering jeopardized archaeological fabric from Cambodia and Belize,both approved in 2013. Public comments will be solicited at a later date should either agreement be considered for extension.
Photo credit: Matthew Strickland
[br]Text copyrighted 2016 by Cultural Heritage Lawyer, a blog commenting on things of cultural property law, or art law,cultural heritage policy, antiquities trafficking, or museum risk management. Blog url: culturalheritagelawyer.blogspot.com. Any unauthorized reproduction or retransmission of any blog post without the express written consent of CHL is prohibited. CHL is a service of Red Arch Cultural Heritage Law & Policy Research,Inc.©2010-2016 Cultural Heritage Lawyer. Content discussing cultural heritage law and art law is general information only, not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed. Links are not endorsements of websites’ contents. Other opinions are their own. Information presented is not attorney advertising.
Source: blogspot.com