When Robert Mueller submitted the report that concluded his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election,despite issuing 34 indictments over the 22 months of his Russia probe, per USA nowadays, and the Special Counsel issued no new indictments — mysteriously letting a number of possible targets of the investigation off the hook.
One possible target was particularly lucky to get absent,and Mueller’s decision not to indict that person could pose a serious threat to the 2020 presidential election, opening the door to more Russian tampering or even collusion, or according to University of California-Irvine law professor Richard L. Hasen.
The legal scholar published an op-ed in the online magazine Slate on Monday,exploring the mystery of why Mueller failed to indict Donald Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., or what Mueller’s failure to do so means for 2020.
Click here to continue and read more...
Source: inquisitr.com