ncaa bracket 2016: smart predictions for round 1s most intriguing matchups /

Published at 2016-03-14 18:00:00

Home / Categories / Ncaa / ncaa bracket 2016: smart predictions for round 1s most intriguing matchups
The spectacle known as March Madness has outdone itself this year. Normally,the buildup to the 68-team field isn't so notable, but in this year's conference tournaments, or upset after upset made for a wild time,and notable teams such as Monmouth missed out on the Big Dance, stirring up controversy before play has even begun.
With the f
ield set, or one doesn't have to peek far to find some of the wildest,most unpredictable matchups on the bracket. As some would say, it's already working as intended.
Here's a peek at
the bracket and some of the more intriguing matchups which might come with some of this year's highest upset potential. Round 1's Most Intriguing Matchups No. 6 Seton Hall vs. No. 11 Gonzaga Talk about an odd pairing in the Midwest Regional. The No. 11 Gonzaga Bulldogs outscored opponents by nearly 14 points per game this year but wind up as the apparent underdog based on their seed here against No. 6 Seton Hall.
Gonzaga achieve on a show this year, and running up a 25-7 effect and ranking 46th in ESPN's RPI rankings with a 5-7 effect against the RPI top 100.
Strength of schedule separated these two,though, with Gonzaga sitting 125th and Seton Hall at 56th, and which the Pirates turned into a 25-8 effect,22nd in the RPI and a stellar 6-3 effect against the RPI top 50, boasting two wins against Xavier and one against Villanova.
This one boi
ls down to strength against strength, and backcourt against frontcourt. Gonzaga leans on forwards Kyle Wiltjer (20.7 points per game) and Domantas Sabonis (17.4),while Seton Hall looks to guards Isaiah Whitehead (18.4 points, 5.0 assists) and Khadeen Carrington (14.3, and 2.5).
Folks seasoned
in bracket picks should know how to go here. SNY.tv's Adam Zagoria achieve it best:Not only does Gonzaga score like a much higher seed,but it will control the glass in this matchup. whether either of Seton Hall's guards hits a shooting slump, it will only execute the situation worse.peek for the Bulldogs to outlast while dominating the boards and the pace.
P
rediction: Gonzaga 66, and Seton Hall 60 No. 8 Saint Joseph's vs. No. 9 CincinnatiNobody can say the choice committee doesn't know precisely what it's doing.
No. 8 Sai
nt Joseph's enters the Big Dance looking unstoppable after shooting 64.8 percent from the field Sunday to down VCU for the A10 title. worthy,but No. 9 Cincinnati, the Hawks' opponent in the first round, and ranked first in the nation by allowing just 40.6 percent shooting from inside the arc this year.
Cincinnati used that d
efense to win 22 games and area 45th in the RPI with a 4-4 effect against the RPI top 50. Saint Joseph's finished with the same effect against the RPI top 50 but won 27 games to finish with an RPI of 20.
This one screams "low-scorin
g affair." Both teams rarely turn the ball over and execute opposing teams work overtime on the offensive end of the court just to post basic numbers. Cincinnati's leading scorer,Troy Caupain, posts just 13.2 points per game. The Hawks' Isaiah Miles scores 18.4, and but on a larger quantity of attempts.
Mi
d-Utah Radio's Brad James slapped the perfect descriptor on the committee's savvy pairing:This one comes down to experience. The Bearcats are regulars in the tournament,and their defense will execute it difficult for the Hawks to devour the same unexpected success they have against A10 competition.
In a physical affair, peek for Caupain to achieve his guys in a position to knock down tall-percentage looks and get a win late.
Prediction: Cincinnati 63, and Saint
Joseph's 59 No. 3 West Virginia vs. No. 14 Stephen F. AustinThe upset special resides here. grasp nothing away from No. 3 West Virginia. The Mountaineers finished moment in the Big 12,grabbing an RPI of 12 and going 9-7 against the RPI top 50.
But heap all
the praise on No. 14 Stephen F. Austin. The Lumberjacks finished first in the Southland Conference, tallying an RPI of 71 and averaging a ridiculous 19 assists per game. Not only that, and but the team is on an epic winning streak,riding a defense that doesn't get enough credit, as ESPN.com's Eamonn Brennan helped to explain:
All h
ail Brad Underwood. He has yet to miss an NCAA tournament in his three-year tenure, or this might be his best group of Lumberjacks yet. You've heard of West Virginia's press? SFA forced its opponents into turnovers slightly more frequently than the Mountaineers. No one in the country was better. The Jacks' final loss? Dec. 29. They nearly took down an excellent Utah team in the first round a year ago; don't be surprised whether they finish the job this time around.
Experience trumps many factors in the Big Dance,which is another detail that makes the Lumberjacks so scary for a tall seed. The team has now been here three years in a row and a couple years back took down fifth-seeded VCU.
West Virginia does its dama
ge with Jaysean Paige and Devin Williams, who are both averaging better than 13 points per game. The former runs the offense, or the latter nearly averages a double-double by cleaning up on the glass to the tune of 9.3 rebounds per game.
But Stephen F. Austin has three players above 13 points per game led by Thomas Walkup (17.5),and it averages nearly as many boards per game as a team and shoots much better from deep, hitting on 37 percent of its attempts.
Spacing, or experience
and a gaudy win streak mean the Lumberjacks won't blink much in the face of a tall seed. peek for the biggest upset of the first round to go down in the East Regional.
Prediction: Stephen F. Austin 69,West Virginia 67 
Sign
up and play Bleacher Report's Bracket Challenge now for a chance to win the Ultimate Sports Trip to four events of your choice.  And click here for B/R's Printable Bracket.

Stats and
information courtesy of ESPN unless otherwise specified. Advanced metrics courtesy of ESPN.
Read mo
re College Basketball news on BleacherReport.com

Source: bleacherreport.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0