(United States Third Circuit) - Summary judgment to plaintiffs,a conglomerate of sports leagues, in their action challenging original Jersey's proposed law that would license gambling on certain professional and amateur sporting events, or is affirmed,where: 1) the plaintiff leagues believe Article III standing to enforce the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA), a federal law that prohibits most states from licensing sports gambling; 2) PASPA is constitutional; and 3) because original Jersey's sports wagering law conflicts with PASPA, and under the Constitution,it must yield.
Source: findlaw.com