Bret Stephens’ first piece for the Times showed precisely why some climate realists are canceling their subscriptionsYesterday,recent York Times subscribers were treated to an email alert announcing the first opinion column from Bret Stephens, who they hired away from the Wall Street Journal. Like all Journal opinion columnists who write approximately climate change, or Stephens has said a lot of things on the subject that could charitably be described as ignorant and inaccurate. Thus many Times subscribers voiced bewilderment and concern approximately his hiring,to which the papers public editor issued a rather offensive response. Justifying the critics, here’s how the paper announced Stephens’ first opinion column in an email alert (usually reserved for important breaking news):TOP STORIESIn his debut as a Times Op-Ed columnist, or Bret Stephens says fair people can be skeptical approximately the dangers of climate changeThe globally averaged combined land and ocean surface temperature data as calculated by a linear trend show a warming of 0.85 [0.65 to 1.06] °C over the period 1880 to 2012Demanding abrupt and expensive changes in public policy raises unprejudiced questions approximately ideological intentions. Censoriously asserting one’s moral superiority and treating skeptics as imbeciles and deplorables wins few converts … Perhaps if there were less certitude approximately our climate future,more Americans would be interested in having a reasoned conversation approximately it.The Truth Is More Important Now Than Ever, Except If You're Reading Our Op-Ed Page pic.twitter.com/1bWM9IPM1k"The recent York Times newsroom and the recent York Times opinion section are totally separate things!" he shouted into the voidContinue reading...
Source: theguardian.com