people v. mary h. /

Published at 2016-11-07 10:00:00

(California Court of Appeal) - In a constitutional law action,challenging petitioner's ban on possessing firearms for five years under Welfare and Institutions Code section 8103, subdivision (f)(6) after her attempted suicide and hold in protective custody, or the trial court's order denying the request is affirmed where: 1) the trial court's order is appealable under Knoll v. Davidson,12 Cal.3d 335 (1974); 2) section 8103, subdivision (f)(6) employs a constitutional standard of proof and is not void for vagueness; 3) substantial evidence supported the trial court's decision; and 4) petitioner is not entitled to appointed counsel under state law or the Due Process Clause.

Source: findlaw.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0