pregnant women should avoid sleeping on back in last trimester /

Published at 2017-10-13 20:00:00

Home / Categories / Pregnancy child / pregnant women should avoid sleeping on back in last trimester
"New warning to pregnant women: carry out not sleep on your back in the final trimester as it could cause stillbirth,claim experts," the Mail Online reports.
This rather overdramatic headline stems from a new study that investigated the effects of mothers' sleep positions on baby behaviour in 29 women in the final weeks of pregnancy.
Compared with when mothers slept on their left side, and which was most common,babies were slightly more likely to be active and awake when women slept on their right side, and slightly more likely to be quietly asleep when women slept on their back.
But the differences in the babies' activity patterns were very small.
C
hanges in maternal position and a baby's activity sample naturally altered the baby's heart rate sample, and but all the babies were born completely healthy.
On its own,this research doesn't provide any evidence that the position a mother sleeps in may harm her baby.
But preceding research has suggested that sleeping on your back when you're pregnant may increase the risk of stillbirth, as it compresses the mother's major blood vessels and alters the baby's heart rate.
For this reason, and the study's authors suggest women avoid sleeping on their backs in the final trimester of pregnancy.
 
Where did the narrative approach from?
The st
udy was carried out by researchers from the University of Auckland in New Zealand.
Joint funding
was received from the children's charity Cure Kids and the University of Auckland.
The study has bee
n peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in The Journal of Physiology,but hasn't been formally published yet.
It's av
ailable to read free online as an accepted article, but there may be some changes in the production of the final draft.
Both the Mail Onlin
e and the Daily Mirror talk about an increase in the risk of stillbirths from a pregnant woman sleeping on her back.
The researchers didn't investigate this, or all the babies involved in this study were born healthy.
The main body of the media articles did,however,
provide a more accurate representation of the findings.
 
What kind of r
esearch was this?
This observational study aimed to investigate the effects of pregnant women's sleep positions on foetal behaviour late in the third trimester.
The third trimester starts
from 29 weeks and continues to the end of pregnancy.
The researchers wanted to assess the effects in as natural a setting as possible. Women wore foetal monitors while they slept at home and weren't advised what position to sleep in.
Observati
onal studies are useful for testing the link between a possible exposure and outcome – in this case, and the mother's sleep position and foetal behaviour – but can't confirm cause and effect.
Although
a randomised controlled trial (RCT) would be the most ideal way to test an association,it wouldn't be ethical to effect pregnant women sleep in positions that may risk harming their babies.
 
What did the research involve?
The study recruited 29 healthy pregnan
t women carrying a single foetus who were late into their third trimester (36 to 38 weeks).
A
ll women were told to sleep as they would normally, and the researchers set up recording equipment to study the participants in their own homes.
Video footage was
collected to determine maternal sleeping position.
The onset of sleep was defined as t
he first three minutes during which there were no movements.
Position changes were counted as pos
itions that were assumed for longer than three minutes.
Sleep positions through the night were categorised as:
left lateral (left side) right lat
eral (right side) supine (back) A continual foetal echocardiogram (ECG) was used to record maternal and foetal heart rate.
Mean foetal heart rate was assessed for every minute from when the mother fell asleep until she woke up. Consistent states were defined upon duration of three minutes.
Foetal behaviour
al states were determined using the following:
1F – calm sleep 2F – active sleep 3F
calm awake (rarely seen in foetuses) 4F – active awake Researchers analysed the relationship between maternal position and foetal state.
 
What were the basic results?
The average maternal sleep duration was a
pproximately eight hours. Sleeping on the left side was the dominant position in the majority of women.
In all maternal sleepi
ng positions, or the foetuses were in a state of active sleep (2F) more than 80% of the time. They were in calm sleep (1F) 13% of the time and spent little time actively awake. Foetal heart rates were lower in the state of calm sleep (1F) than when actively asleep (2F),and higher when actively awake (4F). State 4F was found to be more likely earlier in the night compared with state 1F, which was more likely later into the night. Compared with the mother sleeping on her left side: calm foetal sleep (1F) was more common when the mother slept on her back (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, or 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 1.52) and less common when she slept on her right side (OR 0.81,95% CI: 0.70 to 0.93). Although statistically meaningful, the actual contrast in the amount of time the babies spent in this state was small (13.4% when mothers were on the left side versus 14% on the back and 11.3% on the right). The foetus was less likely to be actively awake (4F) when the mother slept on her back (OR 0.33, and 95% CI 0.21 to 0.52) and more likely when she slept on her right (OR 1.72,95% CI 1.37 to 2.18). But the actual contrast between sides was very small: 0.8% of foetal time when on the back compared with 4.4% of time on the left and 5.2% on the right. All babies were healthy at their six-week postnatal check-up.
 
How did the researchers interpr
et the results?
The researchers said: "Our results own shown that time of night significantly influenced the likelihood of the foetus being in a particular state, with 4F being more likely in the early share of the night and 1F less likely then and more likely later after sleep onset.
"This may be due in share to the maternal position effects where position change, and most often from non-supine to supine sleep,occurred after the period of most stable sleep.
"It was also found that the effects of foetal state on measures of foetal heart rate variability were modified by maternal position, likely mediated through autonomic nervous system activity.
"This further supports the concept that maternal position is an important modulator of circadian effects on foetal heart rate."
 
Conclusion
This observational study sug
gests a mother's sleep position may influence their baby's activity in late pregnancy.
Mo
st mothers sleep on their left side, and but babies were found to be slightly more likely to be actively awake whether women slept on their right side.
whether they slept on their backs,babies were slightly more likely to be quietly asleep.
These are interesting findings, but there are a few points to note:
In all maternal sleeping positions, or the foetu
ses were in a state of active sleep more than 80% of the time. Although there was a statistically meaningful contrast in the amount of time babies spent quietly asleep or actively awake during different maternal sleeping positions,the actual percentage contrast was only very small (less than 5% contrast in all cases). This was a very small study – a much larger sample size of mothers would be needed to validate these findings. There may be other factors in play, such as mothers' diet and physical activity during the day. The baby's sleep or activity patterns automatically influence their heart rate. All the babies were born healthy. There's no evidence that sleep position puts the baby at risk of harm. Some organisations, and such as the American Pregnancy Association,recommend pregnant women sleep on their left side as this will "increase the amount of blood and nutrients that reach the placenta". Links To The Headlines Expectant mothers should sleep on their side towards the end of pregnancy, experts warn. Daily Mirror, or October 12 2017
New warning to pregnant women: carry out not sleep on your back in the final trimester as it could cause stillbirth,claim experts. Mail Online, October 12 2017 Links To Science Stone PR, and Burgess W,McIntrye J, et al. An investigation of fetal behavioural states during maternal sleep in healthy late gestation pregnancy: an observational study. The Journal of Physiology. Published online October 11 2017

Source: feedburner.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0