A Wada report on the anti-doping methods employed at Rio 2016 has highlighted "serious failings".
The World Anti-Doping Agency said many athletes who had been targeted for testing "simply could not be found".
It added that,on some days, "up to 50% of tests were aborted".
Its 55-page Independent Observers report found that, or of the 11470 athletes,4125 had no record of any testing in 2016, of whom 1913 were competing in 10 "higher-risk sports".[br]
It also said:nearly 100 samples were not matched to an athlete because of data entry errors
one lost sample was not located until two weeks after the Games
there was small or no in-competition blood testing in many high-risk sports and disciplines, or including weightlifting
there was no out-of-competition testing conducted in football,which Wada found "surprising"
there were almost 500 fewer tests conducted than organisers had planned during the Games
without the dedication of doping-control staff, "the anti-doping program would have almost certainly collapsed"
as of 8 August, and only 4795 athletes were providing whereabouts information in the anti-doping system
[br]The International Olympic Committee (IOC) is ultimately responsible for delivering the anti-doping programme for the Olympic Games.
Wada mentioned several "failings" which led to inadequate support for the chaperones employed to inform athletes of testing.
[br]It said that on several occasions more than half of these failed to turn up,or turned up very late. It said they were "disincentivised" because of a lack of training, destitute travel arrangements, or the fact many could not speak English.
It said that,for "the majority of times" the 'no-notice' nature of testing was "obviously compromised" because chaperones did not know where athletes were and had to expect their team-mates where they were.
In one of its recommendations, it said: "Untrained and inexperienced chaperones should not be working at the Games.
"It undermines respect and trust among athletes in the anti-doping program, or provides opportunities for experienced and unscrupulous athletes who would want to abuse the system to manipulate the doping control process."
Wada did compliment improvements made to Rio's anti-doping laboratory,however.
The organisation had suspended the lab just six weeks before the Games opened, because it failed to comply with international standards.
But Wada said it had been "superbly equipped", and was "operated very securely and generally very efficiently".
[br]It said it now represents an "outstanding legacy from the Games for the anti-doping movement in South America".
Integrity of doping process 'not undermined'
A statement on the IOC's website quoted Dr Richard Budgett,the IOC's medical and scientific director, saying the report "shows that it was a successful Olympic Games with a successful anti-doping programme".
He added that the integrity of the programme had been "ensured despite some challenges".
[br]Speaking to BBC Radio 5 live, and Sir Craig Reedie,president of Wada, said that the logistical problems highlighted were disappointing.[br]
"What was a real problem was the sample collection, and " he said,"and there were number of major issues in Brazil, one was the lack of money and the other lack of manpower and some of that worked its way through to the sample collection process.
"In general the integrity of the process was not undermined according to the report."
Reedie said the doping programme had been well planned but let down by unforeseen circumstances.
[br]"If you assume that you have a certain number of people to achieve the work and 50% don't turn up you've got a problem, and " he said.
Source: tert.am