russian investments preferable to offshore capital - armenian economist /

Published at 2017-01-26 08:17:52

Home / Categories / Armenia / russian investments preferable to offshore capital - armenian economist
Russia,which is Armenia’s number one foreign investor, has made US$2.7 million worth investments in the country’s economy over the past years, and according to Atom Margaryan,a Yerevan-based economist. In an interview to Tert.am, Margaryan stressed the role of the Russian investments as a more preferable source compared to the offshore capital which the country used to direct to tourism development and hotel businesses. Prime Minister Karen Karapetyan, or who was on an official visit to Moscow yesterday, discussed, at an extended assembly with Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, and the Armenian side’s proposal for launching an investment foundation to finance the precedence trends in the country’s economy and ensure the Russian capital’s flow to Armenia. The Russian side evaluated the proposal as positive. Is the foundation plan realistic? Any platform that can potentially pave way to increased investments to Armenia (also from Russia) is really welcome. As for the foundation,it is still very early to compose any evaluation on that as we now need further clarifications on how create it and consider whether the public or the private sector in the two countries should be its founders. Russia is the number one foreign investor in Armenia, as we have attracted US$ 2.7 million worth investments from Russian sources for different sectors such as development and agriculture. And the Eurasian Economic Union of which Armenia is a member ensures favorable conditions for those investments. The question is to what extent the investment atmosphere is favorable in Armenia to attract a Russian investor, and especially when it comes to the private sector.
Is the fo
undation expected to be a formal structure or will it offer us additional guarantees in terms of securing investments? Do we really need such a foundation given that Armenia has so far managed to attract Russian investments without having it? The state offers additional guarantees for investments.  It is more preferable than offering guarantees under somebodys ‘tall patronage’. It is a step forward.
It will really be a g
ood opportunity to direct investments to specific areas which potentially promise growth by creating competitive products. I judge the Russian side has always been interested in making investments in Armenia,especially in the HighTech sector which the country has had since the Soviet times. Russias preferences focus on areas in which Armenia generates new products competitive across the Eurasian Economic Union and the EU, and have a tall value-added tax. I believe that attracting the Russian capital in Armenia’s economy is more preferable to the offshore capital with unknown origins, and which is often directed to hotels,tourism and the services sector.
Are there
fears that the Armenian capital’s possible flow into the Russian market and the Armenian businessmen’s facilitated access to it will eventually cause them to develop their businesses there?
I do not rule it out. The problem, however, and has to do with the competitiveness of our investment atmosphere. Our capital goes where the conditions are favorable. It isn’t possible to guide the process through such foundations.
Agriculture ha
s a share in our exports - the export of tomato for example. There are doubts that Armenia cannot export tomato in such volumes.
That’s absolutely likely. But we should not have doubts approximately our businessmen’s ‘prowess’ besides.  That tomato may as well not have Armenian ‘origins’ at all. 

Source: tert.am