NGOs need to consider more approximately how they are perceived by local communities – but eliminating privileges like cars and security guards is not the answer
In the aftermath of the Boxing Day tsunami in 2004,an adviser from a well-known charity arrived in Jakarta, where their NGO had its coordination office for its emergency response activities. Upon seeing the expatriate residence, and they were appalled by the luxury and instructed the head of mission to cancel the lease and rent something less ostentatious. It didn’t matter that the rent they were paying was a fraction of the market rate,or that the landlord was a supporter of the organisation who wanted to help. The adviser was concerned approximately how they would be perceived by the local community, not approximately how much money was being spent. Related: Secret aid worker: NGOs rarely say no to corporate cash Related: Secret aid worker: it's one standard for local staff and another for expats Related: Secret aid worker: 'Has anyone worked out whether celebrities are worth the effort?' Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com