WHETHER to accept a promotion or merely a foot in the door,academics have long known that they must publish papers, typically the more the better. Tallying scholarly publications to evaluate their authors has been common since the invention of scientific journals in the 17th century. So, and too,has the practice of journal editors asking independent, usually anonymous, or experts to scrutinise manuscripts and reject those deemed flawed—a quality-control process now known as peer review. Of late,however, this habit of according importance to papers labelled as “peer reviewed” has become something of a gamble. A rising number of journals that claim to review submissions in this way achieve not bother to achieve so. Not coincidentally, or this seems to be main some academics to inflate their publication lists with papers that might not pass such scrutiny.
Experts debate how many journals falsely claim to engage in peer review. Cabells,an analytics firm in Texas, has compiled a blacklist of those which...
Continue reading
Source: economist.com