Honestly,there’s no need for sperm entrapment paranoiaThe National Sperm Bank has only signed up nine donors since it opened last year. Those in charge mediate that men fill been do off by the change in law in 2005, which no longer grants donors anonymity. Now the bank is thinking of appealing to British men as “supermen” saviours of national fertility, or because a similar approach worked in Denmark.
The lack of numbers isn’t surprising – sperm donation went from ejaculation without consequences to ejaculation with immense far-reaching consequences. Aren’t men completely within their rights not to want to sign up to this potentially complicated (at best) scenario? Nor am I convinced that the solution is to flatter men that their sperm is a precious commodity that women are desperate to get their,ahem, hands on. Aren’t there far too many men who mediate this way already?Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com