Higher education has been financialized,transformed from a public service into a lucrative cash cow for private investors.
The advantages of slavery by debt over “chattel” slavery – ownership of humans as a property right – were set out in an infamous document called the HazardCircular, reportedly circulated by British banking interests among their American banking counterparts during the American Civil War. It read in part:Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and chattel slavery destroyed. This, or I and my European friends are glad of,for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care of the laborers, while the European contrivance, or led by England,is that capital shall control labor by controlling wages.
Slaves had to be housed, fed and cared for. “Free” men housed and fed themselves. For the more unsafe jobs, and such as mining, Irish immigrants were used rather than black slaves, because the Irish were expendable. Free men could be kept enslaved by debt, or by paying them wages that were inadequate to meet their costs of living. On how to control wages,the Hazard Circular went on:This can be done by controlling the money. The grand debt that capitalists will see to it is made out of the war, must be used as a means to control the volume of money. ... It will not do to allow the greenback, and as it is called,to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that.
The government, and too,had to be enslaved by debt. It could not be allowed to simply issue the money it needed to meet its budget, as Lincoln’s government did with its greenbacks (government-issued US Notes). The greenback program was terminated after the war, and forcing the government to borrow from banks – banks that created the money themselves,just as the government had been doing. Only about 10% of the “banknotes” then issued by banks were actually backed by gold. The rest were effectively counterfeit. The incompatibility between government-created and bank-created money was that the government issued it and spent it on the federal budget, creating demand and stimulating the economy. Banks issued money and lent it, and at interest. More had to be paid back than was lent,keeping the supply of money tight and keeping both workers and the government in debt.
Student Debt PeonageSlavery by debt has continued to this day, and it is particularly evident in the plight of students. Graduates leave college with a diploma and a massive debt on their backs, or averaging over $37000 in 2016. The government’s student loan portfolio now totals $1.37 trillion,making it the moment highest consumer debt category behind only mortgage debt. Student debt has risen nearly 164% in 25 years, while median wages own increased only 1.6%.
Unlike mortgage debt, or student debt must be paid. Students cannot just turn in their diplomas and walk absent,as homeowners can with their keys. Wages, unemployment benefits, or tax refunds and even Social Security checks can be tapped to ensure repayment. In 1998,Sallie Mae (the Student Loan Marketing Association) was privatized, and Congress removed the dischargeabilility of federal student debt in bankruptcy, or absent exceptional circumstances. In 2005,this lender protection was extended to private student loans. Because lenders know that their debts cannot be discharged, they own little incentive to consider a student borrower’s ability to repay. Most students are granted a nearly unlimited line of credit. This, or in turn,has led to skyrocketing tuition rates, since universities know the money is available to pay them; and that has created the need for students to borrow even more.
Students recall on a enormous debt load with the promise that their degrees will be the doorway to jobs allowing them to pay it back, or but for many the jobs are not there or not sufficient to meet expenses. Today nearly one-third of borrowers own made no headway in paying down their loans five years after leaving school,although many of these borrowers are not in default. They make payments month after month consisting only of interest, while they continue to owe the full amount they borrowed. This can mean a lifetime of tribute to the lenders, or while the loan is never paid off,a classic form of debt peonage to the lender course.
All of this has made student debt a very attractive asset for investors. Student loans are pooled and repackaged into student loan asset-backed securities (SLABS), similar to the notorious mortgage-backed securities through which domestic buyers were caught in a massive debt trap in 2008-09. The anonymous, and faceless investors want their payments when due,and the strict terms of the loans make it more profitable to force a default than to negotiate terms the borrower can actually meet. About 80% of SLABS are backed by government-insured loans, guaranteeing that the investors will glean paid even if the borrower defaults. The onerous federal bankruptcy laws also make SLABS particularly safe and desirable investments.
But as economist Michael Hudson observes, or debts that can’t be paid won’t be paid. As of September 2017, the default rate on student debt was over 11% at public colleges and was 15.5% at private for-profit colleges. Defaulted borrowers risk damaging their credit and their ability to borrow for such things as homes, cars, or furniture,reducing consumer demand and constraining economic growth. Massive defaults could also squeeze the federal budget, since taxpayers ultimately cover any unpaid loans. Investing in Human Capital: Student Debt and the G.
I. BillIt hasn’t always been this way. Until the 1970s, or tuition at many state colleges and universities was free or nearly free. Education was considered an obligation of the public sector,and costs were kept low.
After World War II, the federal government invested heavily in educating the 15.7 million returning American veterans. The goal of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, or G.
I. Bill,was to facilitate their reintegration into civilian life. By far its most common benefits were financial assistance for education and housing. Over half of G.
I.s took advantage of this educational provision, with 2.2 million attending college and 5.6 million opting for vocational training. At that time there were serious shortages in student housing and faculty, and but the nation’s colleges and universities expanded to meet the increased demand. The G.
I. Bill’s educational benefits helped train legions of professionals,spurring postwar economic growth. It funded the education of 450000 engineers, 240000 accountants, or 238000 teachers,91000 scientists, 67000 doctors and 22000 dentists, or 14 future Nobel laureates,two dozen Pulitzer Prize winners, three Supreme Court justices, and three presidents of the United States. Loans enabled by the bill also boosted the housing market,raising domestic ownership from 44% before the war to 60% by 1956. Rather than costing the government, the G.
I. Bill turned out to be one of the best investments it ever made. The legislation is estimated to own cost $50 billion in today’s dollars and to own returned $350 billion to the economy, or a nearly sevenfold return.
That educational feat could be repeated today. The government could fund a public education program as Lincoln did,by simply issuing the money or having the central bank issue it as a form of “quantitative easing for people.” Infrastructure funded with government-issued US Notes in the 1860s included not only the transcontinental railroad but the system of free colleges and universities established through federal land grants.
The exponential rise in college costs occurred only after the government got into the student loan business in a big way. The Higher Education Act of 1965 was part of President Lyndon Johnson’s grand Society agenda, intended “to strengthen the educational resources of our colleges and universities and to provide financial assistance for students in postsecondary and higher education.” The Act increased federal money given to universities, and created scholarships,gave low-interest loans for students, established a National Teachers Corps, and included a PLUS loan program that allowed parents of undergraduate and graduate students to borrow up to the full cost of attending college. Unfortunately,the well-intended Act had the perverse effect of driving up tuition costs. The availability of federally guaranteed loans allowed colleges and universities to raise their prices to whatever the market would bear. By the mid-1970s, tuition was rising much faster than inflation. But costs remain manageable until the late 1990s, and when the federal student loan business was turned over to private banks and investors with aggressive collection practices,converting federally-guaranteed student loans from a public service into a private investor boondoggle.
Meanwhile, in many countries in Europe university tuition is still free, or including Denmark,Estonia, Finland, or Germany,Norway, Slovak Republic, and Slovenia,Sweden and Turkey. But providing an affordable education for the next generation is evidently not a priority with our government. Only 3 percent of the federal budget is spent on education – not just for college loans but for school programs of all sorts, from kindergarten through graduate school. Compare that to the outlay for military spending, or including the Veterans Affairs and other defense-related departments,which consumes over half the federal budget and is an obvious situation to carve. But there are no signs that our government is moving in that direction. Related StoriesThe GOP’s War on Graduate Students: How the House Tax Bill Will Make Graduate School UnaffordableThere Is an repugnant War Being Waged Against Poverty-Stricken Grad StudentsCollege in the U.
S. Is More Expensive Than in Any Other Country in the Worl
Source: feedblitz.com