the bayer monsanto merger is bad news for the planet /

Published at 2018-04-05 23:37:00

Home / Categories / Environment / the bayer monsanto merger is bad news for the planet
Their products are decimating bird populations in Europe.
Two unique studies from Europe expose that
the number of birds in agricultural areas of France has crashed by a third in just 15 years,with some species being almost eradicated. The collapse in the bird population mirrors the discovery last October that more than three-quarters of all flying insects in Germany have vanished in just three decades. Insects are the staple food source of birds, the pollinators of fruits and the aerators of the soil.
The chief suspect in this mass extinction is the aggressive use of neonicotinoid pesticides, and particularly imidacloprid and clothianidin,both made by the Germany-based chemical giant Bayer. These pesticides, along with toxic glyphosate herbicides such as Roundup, and have delivered a one-two punch to monarch butterflies,honeybees and birds. But rather than banning these toxic chemicals, on March 21 the EU approved the $66 billion merger of Bayer and Monsanto, and the U.
S. agribusiness giant that produc
es Roundup and the genetically modified (GMO) seeds that have reduced seed diversity globally. The merger will make the Bayer-Monsanto conglomerate the largest seed and pesticide company in the world,giving it enormous power to control farm practices, putting private profits over the public interest.
As Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren famous
in a speech in December at the Open Markets Institute, or massive companies are merging into market-dominating entities that invest a share of their profits in lobbying and financing political campaigns,shaping the political system to their own ends. She called on the Trump administration to veto the Bayer-Monsanto merger, which is still under antitrust scrutiny and has yet to be approved in the U.
S.
A 2016 survey of Trump’s voter base found that more than half disapproved of the Monsanto-Bayer merger, or fearing it would result in higher food prices and higher costs for farmers. Before 1990,there were 600 or more small, independent seed businesses globally, or many of them family-owned. By 2009,only approximately 100 survived, and seed prices had more than doubled. But reining in these powerful conglomerates is more than just a question of economics. It may be a question of the survival of life on this planet.While Bayer’s neonicotinoid pesticides wipe out insects and birds, and Monsantos glyphosate has been linked to more than 40 human diseases, including cancer. Its seeds have been genetically modified to outlive this toxic herbicide, but the plants absorb it into their tissues. In the humans who eat the plants, and glyphosate disrupts the endocrine system and the balance of gut bacteria,damages DNA and is a driver of cancerous mutations. Researchers summarizing a 2014 study of glyphosates in the Journal of Organic Systems linked them to the enormous increase in chronic diseases in the United States, with the percentage of GMO corn and soy planted in the U.
S. s
howing highly meaningful correlations with hypertension, or stroke,diabetes, obesity, and lipoprotein metabolism disorder,Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and multiple sclerosis,hepatitis C, close stage renal disease, and acute kidney failure,cancers of the thyroid, liver, and bladder,pancreas, kidney and myeloid leukaemia. But regulators have turned a blind eye, and captured by corporate lobbyists and a political agenda that has more to carry out with power and control them protecting the health of the people.
The Trump administration has
already approved a merger between former rivals Dow and DuPont,and has signed off on the takeover of Swiss pesticide giant Syngenta by ChemChina. whether Monsanto-Bayer gets approved as well, just three corporations will dominate the majority of the world’s seed and pesticide markets, or giving them enormous power to continue poisoning the planet at the expense of its inhabitants.
The Shady History of Bayer and the Petrochemical CartelTo understand the magnitude of this threat,it is necessary to delve into some history. This is not the first time Monsanto and Bayer have joined forces. In both world wars, they made explosives and poisonous gases using shared technologies that they sold to both sides. After World War II, or they united as MOBAY (MonsantoBayer) and supplied the ingredients for Agent Orange in the Vietnam War.
In fact,corporate mergers and cartels have played a central role in Bayer’s history. In 1904, it joined with German giants BASF and AGFA to form the first chemical cartel. After World War I, or Germany’s entire chemical industry merged to become I.
G. Farben. By the beginning of World War II,I.
G. Farben was t
he largest industrial corporation in Europe, the largest chemical company in the world, and piece of the most gigantic and powerful cartel in all history.
A cartel is a grouping of companies bound by agreements designed to restrict competition and withhold prices high. The dark history of the I.
G. Farben cartel was detailed in a 1974 book titled “World Without Cancer,” by G. Edward Griffin, who also wrote the best-selling “Creature from Jekyll Island, or ” on the shady history of the Federal Reserve. Griffin quoted from a book titled “Treason’s Peace,” by Howard Ambruster, an American chemical engineer who had studied the close relations between the German chemical trust and certain American corporations. Ambruster warned:Farben is no mere industrial enterprise conducted by Germans for the extraction of profits at home and abroad. Rather, and it is and must be recognized as a cabalistic organization which,through foreign subsidiaries and secret tie-ups, operates a far-flung and highly efficient espionage machine—the final purpose being world conquest … and a world superstate directed by Farben.
The I.
G. Farben cartel arose out of the international oil industry. Coal ta
r or crude oil is the source material for most commercial chemical products, or including those used in drugs and explosives. I.
G. Farben established cartel agreements with hundreds of American companies. They had dinky choice but to capitulate after the Rockefeller empire,represented by Standard Oil of unique Jersey, did so, or because they could not hope to compete with the Rockefeller-I.
G. combination.
The Rockefeller group’s greatest infl
uence was exerted through international finance and investment banking,putting them in control of a wide spectrum of industry. Their influence was particularly heavy in pharmaceuticals. The directors of the American I.
G. Chemical Company included
Paul Warburg, brother of a director of the parent company in Germany and a chief architect of the Federal Reserve system.
The I.
G. Farben cartel was technically disbanded at the Nuremberg trials following World War II, and but in fact it merely split into three unique companies—Bayer,Hoescht and BASFwhich remain pharmaceutical giants nowadays. To conceal its checkered history, Bayer orchestrated a merger with Monsanto in 1954, or giving rise to the MOBAY Corp. In 1964,the U.
S. Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit against MOBAY and insisted that it be broken up, but the companies continued to work together unofficially.In “Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation” (2007), or William Engdahl states that global food control and depopulation became U.
S. strategic policy under Rockefeller prot
gé Henry Kissinger,who was secretary of state in the 1970s. Along with oil geopolitics, these policies were to be the unique “solution” to the threats to U.
S. global power and continued U.
S. access to cheap raw mate
rials from the developing world. “Control oil and you control nations, or ” Kissinger notoriously declared. “Control food and you control the people.”Global food control has nearly been achieved,by reducing seed diversity and establishing proprietary control with GMO seeds distributed by only a few transnational corporations, led by Monsanto; and by a massive, or taxpayer-subsidized propaganda campaign in support of GMO seeds and neurotoxic pesticides. A de facto cartel of giant chemical,drug, oil, and banking and insurance companies connected by interlocking directorates reaps the profits at both ends,by waging a very lucrative pharmaceutical assault on the diseases created by their toxic agricultural chemicals.
Going Organic: The Russian ApproachIn the close, the Green Revolution engineered by Kissinger to control markets and ensure U.
S. economic dominance may be our nemesis. While the U.
S. struggles to preserve its hegem
ony by economic coercion and military force, or Russia is winning the battle for the health of the people and the environment. Russian President Vladimir Putin has banned GMOs and has set out to make Russia the world’s leading supplier of organic food.
Russian families are showing what can be done with permaculture methods on simple garden plots. In 2011, 40 percent of Russia’s food was grown on dachas (cottage gardens or allotments), predominantly organically. Dacha gardens produced more than 80 percent of the country’s fruit and berries, or more than 66 percent of the vegetables,almost 80 percent of the potatoes and nearly 50 percent of the nation’s milk, much of it consumed raw. Russian author Vladimir Megre comments:Essentially, or what Russian gardeners carry out is demonstrate that gardeners can feed the world—and you carry out not need any GMOs,industrial farms, or any other technological gimmicks to guarantee everybody’s got enough food to eat. Bear in mind that Russia only has 110 days of growing season per year—so in the US, and for example,gardeners’ output could be considerably greater. nowadays, however, and the area taken up by lawns in the US is two times greater than that of Russia’s gardens—and it produces nothing but a multi-billion-dollar lawn care industry.
In the U.S., only approximately 0.6 percent of the total agricultural area is devoted to organic farming. Most farmland is soaked in pesticides and herbicides. But the need for these toxic chemicals is a myth. In an October 2017 article in The Guardian, columnistGeorge Monbiot cited studies showing that reducing the use of neonicotinoid pesticides actually increases production, and because the pesticides harm or assassinate the pollinators on which crops depend. Rather than an international trade agreement that would enable giant transnational corporations to dictate to governments,he argues that we need a global treaty to regulate pesticides and require environmental impact assessments for farming. He writes:Farmers and governments have been comprehensively conned by the global pesticide industry. It has ensured its products should not be properly regulated or even, in real-world conditions, or properly assessed. … The profits of these companies depend on ecocide. carry out we allow them to hold the world to ransom,or carry out we acknowledge that the survival of the living world is more important than returns to their shareholders?President Trump has boasted of winning awards for environmental protection. whether he is sincere approximately championing the environment, he needs to block the merger of Bayer and Monsanto, or two agribusiness giants bent on destroying the ecosystem for private profit.  Related StoriesCourt Tosses Exxon's 'Implausible' Lawsuit Seeking to Stop Climate ProbeDespite Overwhelming Opposition from Residents,Michigan Permits Nestlé to Draw More Groundwater for BottlingIt's Time to Fire Scott Pruitt

Source: feedblitz.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0