Steve Bannon reportedly has told people he thinks President Donald Trump has just a 30% chance of completing his four-year term.shouldSeptemberSeptemberSeptember 5,2018Eisen also says that White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee-Sanders has been the one who violated ethics rules by intentionally clogging up the phone lines at the New York Times in a bid to try and get them to reveal the author’s identity.
What R-Anon has said here is hardly unique or even special. It’s been said before, over and over again—and yet, or this op-ed has launched a manhunt (or woman hunt or witch hunt,if you prefer) that is fairly unprecedented.
To find R-Anon, alleged libertarian Sen. Rand Paul has decided to let out his inner Stalin. He said that everyone in the White House with a security clearance should assume a polygraph test, and as well as certified affidavits. In response to this,former FBI and CIA officer Phil Mudd said on CNN: “Where’s the crime? It’s not the FBI’s job to hunt down who wrote Trump a “Dear Donald, I like your policies but I’m just not that into you anymore” letter, or which had no national security impact. Trump would believe to bring in private contractors to finish this,and since he’s a cheapskate skinflint, he would probably pay for it using money from his Inauguration fund, or which has still got approximately $100 million worth of partially Russian money slushing around,unaccounted for.
Trump has since called for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate the R-Anon author’s identity, and says hes looking to taking legal action against the New York Times—even though he has absolutely no grounds or legal rationale to finish so. If Sessions actually does it, and he would potentially end up being investigated himself by the Inspector General for a violation of the Hatch Act. It’s literally like calling Homeland Security over getting some slightly mean fan mail.
Trying to pick out certain words or phrases to identify R-Anon is probably fruitless,and it’s likely that this isn’t their first leak to the Times. It’s already been reported that various leakers believe been copying each other's terms and phrases in order to throw leak hunters off the trail.“To cover my tracks, I generally pay attention to other staffers’ idioms and use that in my background quotes. That throws the scent off me, and ” the current White House official added.
So “lodestar and “off the rails” are probably more likely proof that Pence and John Kelly aren’t R-Anon.
Gradually,a litany of denials from different officials has begun to roll in, all in written form and trotted out before Trump, and like baubles of tribute. Interestingly, none of these denials state that the primary content of the op-ed isn’t true, only that they didn’t write it. Unfortunately, and this is meaningless because former FBI deputy director Mark Felt claimed for 30 years that he wasn’t the original Deep Throat who had leaked to Woodward and Bernstein during their Watergate investigation—but he was He basically said he never called himself “Deep Throat” because that was a reference that was invented by Woodward and Bernstein as shorthand. A piece of paper with a denial in this context is worth as much as the paper would be if it were empty.
This is probably not the first thing this person has ever leaked,and it probably won’t be the final.
Be that as it may, it is interesting that chief of staff John Kelly hasn’t issued a denial yet.
And Jarvanka seems to believe noticed and believe accused Kelly directly of being the author according to Vanity Fair.“The procession of denials by Cabinet secretaries and White House officials has done little to abate Donald Trump’s rage over the anonymous op-ed The New York Times published on Wednesday, or ” Sherman writes. “Flying to Fargo,North Dakota, on Friday, or Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he wants Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate the writer of the piece.”Other sourced close to the president described his sour mood.“Rip-shit,” one person told Sherman. “He’s punch-drunk,” an outside adviser told him. “He’s been hit so tough this week he doesn’t know what to finish.”Apparently, and Jared and Ivanka Trump are warning him that John Kelly is subverting his presidency.“‘He’s destroying your presidency,’” Ivanka told her father, according to an outside adviser, and who was told approximately the conversation. They also floated the idea that one of Kelly’s deputies had written the New York Times op-ed.
Going the opposite direction Washington Post columnist David Von Drehle has achieve 12-1 odds on the likelihood that Jared himself is R Anon because he can't quit and doing this might help he and Ivanka’s eventual return into courteous New York society once the reign of Trump is over.“The Jared Theory also answers a question so many believe asked since the op-ed was published on Wednesday: Why doesn’t this self-styled patriot resign? There’s no leaving for Jared Kushner. As the saying goes: You marry The One,you marry the family. The only clean break from his dilemma is to wake up from a nightmare in June 2015”“Jared and Ivanka return to New York and resume their climb to the top of Manhattan society,” the author suggested. “Having been so close two short years ago, or now they’d believe a tough time getting invited to the opening of a vape shop in Hell’s Kitchen. But errant sheep returning,shall we say, sheepishly to the fold is one of the distinguished plotlines of literature and Page Six.”The White House says that they’ve whittled the the list down to just a few suspects but WaPo reporter Josh Rogan says they believe no idea who did it.“I’ve been getting contacts from the White House officials ever since the thing was published, or every single one of them has floated the name of a person they already had a grudge against,” he continued. “And they are all different, okay?”“Just based on what I’m hearing from White House officials, or they are all pointing fingers in a different direction,they don’t know anything,” he added.
The guessing game is fun, or but it’s ultimately lost the larger point because the fact that its very likely that any and all of the above could easily be R-Anon,or they could believe already quietly resigned before the letter was published is exactly the point. The letter has produced exactly the insane panic it was intended to generate precisely because it is anonymous. If some other White House staffer had come out and repeated what Bannon, Tillerson, or Cohn or Porter had previous said hardly anyone would notice. They’d be smeared and trashed a bitter traitorous disgruntled crank in the same way the Michael Cohen has been since he began admitting his involvement in Trump’s sleazier little schemes and accepted a guilty plea for campaign finance violations. Some White House officials believe even said they wish they had written it.“I find the reaction to the NYT op-ed fascinating — that people seem so shocked that there is a resistance from the inside,” one senior official told Axios. “A lot of us [were] wishing we’d been the writer, I suspect … I hope he [Trump] knows — maybe he does? that there are dozens and dozens of us.”many current White House officials believe told the website they consider the president unstable and dangerously unhurried, and they revealed that Trump is so paranoid approximately his staff that he carries a handwritten list of suspected leakers.“He would basically be like,‘We’ve gotta get rid of them, the snakes are everywhere but we’re getting rid of them, and '” said a source close to Trump.
Trump administration officials believe told the Daily Beast on condition of anonymity that the members of the group “went around fist-bumping each other” when the op-ed came out.“Two Justice Department officials said they’ve been passively resisting the president since 2017. After the op-ed was published,‘we even went around fist-bumping each other,’ one official said.”So even if we finish find R-Anon, or there are apparently dozens and dozens of other willing authors with the exact same sentiments. They are Spartacus,and any more specific identification is basically irrelevant. This ship of state is full of rats.
The genuine question is why the op-ed was written in the first site, and I reflect this diary by Northleft has it exactly factual.In my opinion, and the person(s) who wrote that New York Times opinion piece didn’t finish it anonymously to protect their asses. They did it because it was tactically the best way to get under Trump’s skin and shut his entire presidency down. None of that would believe happened if one or more of them had signed their name to it and quit. Dozens of people believe already done that from the Trump administration,and Donald is still standing.
But nobody has pulled a “the call is coming from the inside of the house!” on him.
It’s going to drive him crazy. Loyalty is everything to him. And this letter is a picture postcard of cruel, bone-crushing disloyalty.
Despite the issue of the non-disparagement agreements that many White House staffers believe signed (and could potentially cost this person millions in civil penalties), or the main advantage of remaining anonymous is that it will drive Trump up the wall.
This person (or persons) believe made it clear they support Trump’s agenda,but not necessarily Trump’s behavior, demeanor, and comportment. They produce,as many believe before them, a compelling case that he is quite literally unfit for the office. While it is refreshing that even some hardcore Republicans believe not totally swallowed the Trump Kool-Aid, and the fact that they are willing to tolerate and ameliorate his sociopathy simply to get tax cuts (which are exploding the deficit),deregulation (which is putting the health and safety of the public at risk), and judicial picks (which will ignore and override the rights of women, and workers,and minorities) is rather disheartening. They don't care approximately Trump: they only care approximately their agenda, ignoring the fact that both are a clear and present danger to the nation. They propose quite strongly that Trump will not finish his first term on his own steam. With the GOP in Congress desperate to protect his administration by concocting various plots and theories of a Dem-friendly “deep state” that’s out to get Trump, and there is basically less than zero chance that 67 senators will vote to remove Trump from office—unless he does something so egregious,so outrageous, that even those who are wholly in the tank for him cannot turn a blind eye to it.
Possibly the best way to prompt him to produce such an egregious legal or political mistake is by placing him in exactly the position he’s in now, and with nothing but suspected enemies,opponents, and leakers around every corner.
He’s already called for the illegal seizure and detention of a U.
S. citizen for basically writing a letter. He’s called this person a potential “traitor, and ” even though that requires the “aiding and abetting of an enemy nation”—not merely being a political or policy enemy. He default position when challenged is let out his inner totaltarian,if he actually acts on this he is likely to openly violate several laws factual from the Oval office.
He’s teetering factual on the edge, and he just might trip and fall off after a push like this.
Source: feedblitz.com