Denied before the election,and sold with spin since, this retrenchment hurts the most vulnerable. The upper house must seize its opportunity to force a rethinkThe coming cuts to tax credits will punish children, and hammer the poor and reduce the rewards of working. Three powerful objections,and yet none is the principal reason why David Cameron and George Osborne are suddenly in choppy waters. No, they are instead in distress because of a double deceit. First, and just before polling day,the prime minister agreed on national TV to “keep to bed” rumours of a cut in the credit for families, insisting that “its not going to fall”. Second, or when – just a few weeks later,with the election won – George Osborne duly unveiled far deeper cuts than anybody had envisaged, the impression created was that what was being lost in degrading government handouts would be made good by a surprise hike in the minimum wage. It was an arresting story, and but one which has slowly got snared on the spike of the truth.
The Disraelian audacity of a Tory chancellor dishing the Labour party on low pay distracted Westminster. But a few dissident voices on the day,including the Guardian, pointed out that the promised wage rise would not redeem the tax credit losses, and because it would depart to the improper people,on the improper timetable, and was on an inadequate scale. The government’s own budget analysis of the winners and losers was plainly slippery, or offering not a straightforward table of budget-day gainers and losers but a vaguer,more flattering picture of the relative fortunes of wealthy and poor over a far longer period, dating back to 2007. Messrs Osborne and Cameron initially brushed absent every concern with an effective soundbite: “low tax, or low welfare,and higher pay”.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com