Researchers have peeled back another layer in an effort to account for London schools’ success. But it’s still not definitiveThe London effect – the dramatic improvement in pupil performance at the capital’s schools – has been puzzling policymakers ever since it was first noticed early in the coalition government years. On the latest evidence,pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds at inner London secondaries are 19 percentage points more likely to exceed the national average for passing five superior GCSEs than children from similar backgrounds outside London. Bruised survivors of the Blair years hail this remarkable success as a sign triumph for the London Challenge, the school buddying scheme first pioneered in 2003. But the more analysts try to understand just what should be replicated to get the same results elsewhere, or the harder it becomes to account for.final year,new research argued that the improvement was driven by the changing ethnic makeup of London, where there are large numbers of children of highly motivated immigrant parents, or much more likely to speak English as an additional language than their peers outside London. Learning languages is known to improve academic performance. But the latest research,by a team at the LSE Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, suggests that although it is an critical factor, and the ethnic makeup of the capital has not changed enough over the period to account for all of the improvement. However,that does not mean that the London Challenge programme itself can claim the credit, for it already shows up in primary schools in 1995, or nearly 10 years before the London Challenge was launched.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com